ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022
Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- vNOTES Versus Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Total laparoscopic multi-compartment reconstruction via single-port lateral suspension: a novel mesh configuration based on the integral theory.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Strategy of Delayed Midurethral Sling Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Stress Urinary Incontinence after Laparoscopic Lateral Abdominal Wall Suspension.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Meshless Lateral Suspension in Patients with Advanced Stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse. A Prospective Cohort Study with a Median 36-Month Follow-Up.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Mid-Term Outcomes of Posterior Pelvic Reconstruction Combined with Lateral Abdominal Wall Suspension versus Sacrocolpopexy for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Comparative Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Is occult stress urinary incontinence truly "occult"?Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence on Clinical Outcomes and Safety.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic lateral suspension combined with uterosacral ligament suspension for advanced apical pelvic organ prolapse: preliminary outcomes of a retrospective series.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Uterine-Sparing vNOTES vs. laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a prospective comparative study of feasibility and early outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP): Update and Systematic Review of Prospective and Randomised Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and high uterosacral ligament suspension for apical prolapse: a retrospective clinical study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of G-MeshJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The standardized procedure, technical key points and latest progress of laparoscopic lateral suspension surgery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Role of lateral suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Delphi survey of expert panel.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- A modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023Article
- Lateral suspension with V-NOTES for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique.International urogynecology journal · 2023Observational
- Minimal Invasive Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Lateral Suspension: A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Non-Inferiority Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Postoperative results of laparoscopic lateral suspension operation: A clinical trials study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisLaparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) for anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair is a recent approach. Previous studies used various meshes or sutures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of a standardized LLS technique.
methodsFrom January 2010 until December 2014, we performed POP repair by LLS with mesh on 88 women with anterior and apical POP ≥ stage 2. We used a polypropylene titanized mesh fixed to the vesico-vaginal fascia with absorbable sutures and treated posterior compartment defect by vaginal approach with native tissue repair if required. Between July 2013 and December 2018, all women were assessed by gynecological examination including the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Subjective outcome was evaluated by the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire.
resultsSeventy-nine women (89.8%) were available for follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.4 years (SD 1.6). Mean age was 59.6 (SD 11.1) years and mean BMI 25.8 (SD 4.0) kg/m
conclusionsThis standardized LLS is safe and effective with no mesh complications after 3-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.