Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33835192›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021

[Recommendations for ethical decision making regarding hospital visitation during the COVID-19 pandemic].

Annette Rogge, Michaela Naeve-Nydahl, Peter Nydahl, Florian Rave, Kathrin Knochel, Katharina Woellert, Claudia Schmalz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [The intensive care diary-a communication tool].Procare : das forbildungsmagazin fur pflegeberufe · 2023
    Article
  6. [The intensive care diary-a communication tool].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annette RoggeInstitut für experimentelle Medizin, Abteilung Medizinethik, CAU Kiel, Klinisches Ethikkomitee, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. annette.rogge@uksh.de.
Michaela Naeve-NydahlKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Intensivpflege, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
Peter NydahlPflegeforschung, Klinik für Anästhesie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
Florian RaveKlinisches Ethikkomitee, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Kathrin KnochelInstitut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin TUM, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München (TUM), München, Deutschland.
Katharina WoellertVorstandsbeauftragte für Klinische Ethik, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Claudia SchmalzKlinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visitation restrictions in hospitals during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to great psychological burden for patients, their relatives and employees. For hospitals, they represent a complex organizational challenge with respect to ethics. The present recommendations are intended to support decision-making at the meso- and microlevels.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDecision MakingHospitalsHumansSARS-CoV-2Disease transmission, infectiousEthics, clinicalPrimary preventionPublic healthSARS-CoV‑2

Identifiers

PMID33835192
PMCPMC8033547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.