ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2021
Expert opinions on the regulation of plant genome editing.
Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Nitrogen Fixation: Multifunctional Roles of Common Bean in Organic Agroecosystems and Ecosystem-Oriented Breeding Strategies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bridging Biosynthesis and Bioavailability: Integrated Strategies for Tailoring Soybean Isoflavone Profiles.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- The regulatory frameworks surrounding CRISPR-edited papaya and their impact on international commerce.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Measurement, regional disparities, and dynamic evolution of food crop breeding technology innovation in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent advances in generation of doubled haploid plants for genetic improvement in solanaceous vegetable crops.Planta · 2026Review
- Public acceptance for genetic engineering techniques: the role of food values-based information.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in gene editing for legume improvement: technologies, progress, and prospects.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Transforming viticulture through genomic innovation and integrated pest management for sustainable grape production.NPJ science of plants · 2026Review
- Regulation as key to fulfilling the promises of agricultural genomics: Going beyond bottlenecks in plant gene technology development.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Precision microbial regulation: Strategies for modulating GIT microbiota for host health.iMetaOmics · 2025Article
- A review on regulatory aspects, challenges and public perception in acceptance of genetically modified foods.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing nematode management to achieve global food security goals - An overview.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Regulation of plants developed through new breeding techniques must ensure societal benefits.Nature plants · 2023Article
- Targeted Screening for Spontaneous Insertion Mutations in a Lactic Acid Bacterium, Tetragenococcus halophilus.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- The African continent should consider a harmonized consultative and collaborative effort towards coordinated policy and regulatory guidelines across the fields of biotechnology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Genetically modified foods: bibliometric analysis on consumer perception and preference.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Technique for Temperature, Drought, and Salinity Stress Responses.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- Development of an efficient and precise adenine base editor (ABE) with expanded target range in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).BMC biology · 2022Article
- Consumer acceptance of new plant-breeding technologies: An application to the use of gene editing in fresh table grapes.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global food security is largely affected by factors such as environmental (e.g. drought, flooding), social (e.g. gender inequality), socio-economic (e.g. overpopulation, poverty) and health (e.g. diseases). In response, extensive public and private investment in agricultural research has focused on increasing yields of staple food crops and developing new traits for crop improvement. New breeding techniques pioneered by genome editing have gained substantial traction within the last decade, revolutionizing the plant breeding field. Both industry and academia have been investing and working to optimize the potentials of gene editing and to bring derived crops to market. The spectrum of cutting-edge genome editing tools along with their technical differences has led to a growing international regulatory, ethical and societal divide. This article is a summary of a multi-year survey project exploring how experts view the risks of new breeding techniques, including genome editing and their related regulatory requirements. Surveyed experts opine that emerging biotechnologies offer great promise to address social and climate challenges, yet they admit that the market growth of genome-edited crops will be limited by an ambiguous regulatory environment shaped by societal uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.