Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33834355›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2021

Predictors of 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Carotid Artery Stenting Using Artificial Intelligence.

Amod Amritphale, Ranojoy Chatterjee, Suvo Chatterjee, Nupur Amritphale, Ali Rahnavard, G Mustafa Awan, Bassam Omar, Gregg C Fonarow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prediction of 30-day mortality for ICU patients with Sepsis-3.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of Hypertension on the Severity of COVID-19: A Review.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amod AmritphaleDivision of Cardiology, University Hospital, University of South Alabama, 2451 University Hospital Dr, Suite 10D, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA. aamritphale@health.southalabama.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-3742
Ranojoy ChatterjeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Suvo ChatterjeeEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Nupur AmritphaleUniversity of South Alabama, Children & Women's Hospital, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA.
Ali RahnavardDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
G Mustafa AwanDivision of Cardiology, University Hospital, University of South Alabama, 2451 University Hospital Dr, Suite 10D, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA.
Bassam OmarDivision of Cardiology, University Hospital, University of South Alabama, 2451 University Hospital Dr, Suite 10D, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA.
Gregg C FonarowAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to describe the rates and causes of unplanned readmissions within 30 days following carotid artery stenting (CAS) and to use artificial intelligence machine learning analysis for creating a prediction model for short-term readmissions. The prediction of unplanned readmissions after index CAS remains challenging. There is a need to leverage deep machine learning algorithms in order to develop robust prediction tools for early readmissions.

methodsPatients undergoing inpatient CAS during the year 2017 in the US Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) were evaluated for the rates, predictors, and costs of unplanned 30-day readmission. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), deep neural network (DNN), random forest, and decision tree models were evaluated to generate a robust prediction model.

resultsWe identified 16,745 patients who underwent CAS, of whom 7.4% were readmitted within 30 days. Depression [p < 0.001, OR 1.461 (95% CI 1.231-1.735)], heart failure [p < 0.001, OR 1.619 (95% CI 1.363-1.922)], cancer [p < 0.001, OR 1.631 (95% CI 1.286-2.068)], in-hospital bleeding [p = 0.039, OR 1.641 (95% CI 1.026-2.626)], and coagulation disorders [p = 0.007, OR 1.412 (95% CI 1.100-1.813)] were the strongest predictors of readmission. The artificial intelligence machine learning DNN prediction model has a C-statistic value of 0.79 (validation 0.73) in predicting the patients who might have all-cause unplanned readmission within 30 days of the index CAS discharge.

conclusionsMachine learning derived models may effectively identify high-risk patients for intervention strategies that may reduce unplanned readmissions post carotid artery stenting. CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION: Figure 2: ROC and AUPRC analysis of DNN prediction model with other classification models on 30-day readmission data for CAS subjects.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePatient ReadmissionCarotid ArteriesHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligenceCarotid artery stentingMachine learningReadmission

Identifiers

PMID33834355
PMCPMC8190015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.