ArticleAdvances in therapy2021
Predictors of 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Carotid Artery Stenting Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in carotid research: a 25-year bibliometric analysis of global trends and future directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Lessons from the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) pilot survey: patient-reported outcomes following lower extremity, carotid and aortic artery disease.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Rapid thrombogenesis prediction in COVID-19 patients using DNN with data labeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sex-Related Differences in Early In-Hospital Outcome (Technical Success and Complications) of Carotid Artery Stenting and Risk Factors of Carotid Artery Stenosis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Self-reported outcomes following lower extremity, carotid and aortic artery disease: protocol for the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) survey.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Prediction of 30-day mortality for ICU patients with Sepsis-3.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling for COVID-19 readmission risk using machine learning algorithms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Prediction of unplanned 30-day readmission for ICU patients with heart failure.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Clinical Trials on Gene Therapy in Noncongenital Cardiovascular Diseases: Cross-sectional Study of Three Clinical Trial Registries.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Predicting 30-Day Readmission for Stroke Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Prospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- ResNet-BiLSTM: A Multiscale Deep Learning Model for Heartbeat Detection Using Ballistocardiogram Signals.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Age- and Diagnosis-Based Trends for Unplanned Pediatric Rehospitalizations in the United States.Cureus · 2021Article
- Role of Hypertension on the Severity of COVID-19: A Review.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2021Review
- Article
- Disease and Economic Burden Associated with Recurrent Pericarditis in a Privately Insured United States Population.Advances in therapy · 2021Article
- Patient-specific Computer Simulation: An Emerging Technology for Guiding the Transcatheter Treatment of Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2021Review
- Readmission Rates in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.International journal of MS careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to describe the rates and causes of unplanned readmissions within 30 days following carotid artery stenting (CAS) and to use artificial intelligence machine learning analysis for creating a prediction model for short-term readmissions. The prediction of unplanned readmissions after index CAS remains challenging. There is a need to leverage deep machine learning algorithms in order to develop robust prediction tools for early readmissions.
methodsPatients undergoing inpatient CAS during the year 2017 in the US Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) were evaluated for the rates, predictors, and costs of unplanned 30-day readmission. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), deep neural network (DNN), random forest, and decision tree models were evaluated to generate a robust prediction model.
resultsWe identified 16,745 patients who underwent CAS, of whom 7.4% were readmitted within 30 days. Depression [p < 0.001, OR 1.461 (95% CI 1.231-1.735)], heart failure [p < 0.001, OR 1.619 (95% CI 1.363-1.922)], cancer [p < 0.001, OR 1.631 (95% CI 1.286-2.068)], in-hospital bleeding [p = 0.039, OR 1.641 (95% CI 1.026-2.626)], and coagulation disorders [p = 0.007, OR 1.412 (95% CI 1.100-1.813)] were the strongest predictors of readmission. The artificial intelligence machine learning DNN prediction model has a C-statistic value of 0.79 (validation 0.73) in predicting the patients who might have all-cause unplanned readmission within 30 days of the index CAS discharge.
conclusionsMachine learning derived models may effectively identify high-risk patients for intervention strategies that may reduce unplanned readmissions post carotid artery stenting. CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION: Figure 2: ROC and AUPRC analysis of DNN prediction model with other classification models on 30-day readmission data for CAS subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.