ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2021
[Skin quality and ways to improve skin quality].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin quality has a significant impact on the perception of attractiveness. Procedures to improve skin quality, whose quality is assured, should have sufficiently documented scientific evidence of in vivo and in vitro efficacy and significant effects proven in studies.
objectivesThis paper will present findings from recent studies and experience of experts on skin quality and treatments to improve skin quality. MATERIALS AND
methodsA PubMed database search was conducted in February 2021 on the terms skin quality and minimally invasive skin quality improvement procedures. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, resulting in the selection of 30 papers.
resultsHyaluronic acid (HA) is the most commonly studied agent for skin rejuvenation treatments. The efficacy and safety of the superficially injected HA products are excellently proven on the basis of current data. According to these findings, they ensure an improvement of skin quality without significant volume changes. The skin is hydrated, its elasticity increased, the skin surface smoothened, the complexion (skin redness, glow) improved and fine lines and wrinkles are reduced. They are injected intradermally and have a clinically proven effect duration of up to 12 months.
conclusionsHyaluronic acid is outstandingly suitable for deep hydration of the skin, and its effect is long-term and safe. Natural treatment results fulfil the needs of the patients and increase the patient-practitioner relation. Superficially injected HA products are currently the criterion standard to increase skin quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33834271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.