Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33834266›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2022

Addressing the dark matter of gene therapy: technical and ethical barriers to clinical application.

Kateryna Kratzer, Landon J Getz, Thibaut Peterlini, Jean-Yves Masson, Graham Dellaire

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Mucopolysaccharidoses type I gene therapy.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kateryna Kratzer *Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-9974
Landon J Getz *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-1062
Thibaut PeterliniGenome Stability Laboratory, Oncology Division, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Yves MassonGenome Stability Laboratory, Oncology Division, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada. jean-yves.masson@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-7169
Graham DellaireDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. dellaire@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3466-6316

Funding

CIHR PJT-156017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapies for genetic diseases have been sought for decades, and the relatively recent development of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system has encouraged a new wave of interest in the field. There have nonetheless been significant setbacks to gene therapy, including unintended biological consequences, ethical scandals, and death. The major focus of research has been on technological problems such as delivery, potential immune responses, and both on and off-target effects in an effort to avoid negative clinical outcomes. While the field has concentrated on how we can better achieve gene therapies and gene editing techniques, there has been less focus on when and why we should use such technology. Here we combine discussion of both the technical and ethical barriers to the widespread clinical application of gene therapy and gene editing, providing a resource for gene therapy experts and novices alike. We discuss ethical problems and solutions, using cystic fibrosis and beta-thalassemia as case studies where gene therapy might be suitable, and provide examples of situations where human germline gene editing may be ethically permissible. Using such examples, we propose criteria to guide researchers and clinicians in deciding whether or not to pursue gene therapy as a treatment. Finally, we summarize how current progress in the field adheres to principles of biomedical ethics and highlight how this approach might fall short of ethical rigour using examples in the bioethics literature. Ultimately by addressing both the technical and ethical aspects of gene therapy and editing, new frameworks can be developed for the fair application of these potentially life-saving treatments.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyGerm CellsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.