Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33834208›Full record

ArticleJournal of travel medicine2021

Efficacy of a 3-day pretravel schedule of tafenoquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis: a network meta-analysis.

Nazmul Islam, Sophie Wright, Colleen L Lau, Suhail A R Doi, Deborah J Mills, Justin Clark, Archie C A Clements, Luis Furuya-Kanamori

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of travel medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Tafenoquine for Radical Cure ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Safety and Efficacy of Tafenoquine forTherapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nazmul IslamDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, PO BOX 2713, Qatar.
Sophie WrightANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Colleen L LauSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
Suhail A R DoiDepartment of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, PO BOX 2713, Qatar.
Deborah J MillsDr Deb The Travel Doctor, Travel Medicine Alliance, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Justin ClarkInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia.
Archie C A ClementsFaculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Luis Furuya-KanamoriResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Australian National University · AUQatar University · QAUniversity of Queensland · AUBond University · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1158469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemoprophylaxis with weekly doses of tafenoquine (200 mg/day for 3 days before departure [loading dose], 200 mg/week during travel and 1-week post-travel [maintenance doses]) is effective in preventing malaria. Effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis drugs in travellers is often compromised by poor compliance. Shorter schedules that can be completed before travel, allowing 'drug-free holidays', could increase compliance and thus reduce travel-related malaria. In this meta-analysis, we examined if a loading dose of tafenoquine alone is effective in preventing malaria in short-term travellers.

methodsFour databases were searched in November 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed efficacy and/or safety of tafenoquine for chemoprophylaxis. Network meta-analysis using the generalized pair-wise modelling framework was utilized to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of malaria infection in long-term (>28 days) and short-term (≤28 days) travellers, as well as adverse events (AEs) associated with receiving loading dose of tafenoquine alone, loading dose of tafenoquine followed by maintenance doses, loading dose of mefloquine followed by maintenance doses, or placebo.

resultsNine RCTs (1714 participants) were included. In long-term travellers, compared to mefloquine, tafenoquine with maintenance doses (OR = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-2.46) was equally effective in preventing malaria, while there was an increased risk of infection with the loading dose of tafenoquine alone (OR = 2.89; 95% CI: 0.78-10.68) and placebo (OR = 62.91; 95% CI: 8.53-463.88). In short-term travellers, loading dose of tafenoquine alone (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.04-22.42) and tafenoquine with maintenance doses (OR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.06-16.10) were as effective as mefloquine. The risk of AEs with tafenoquine with maintenance doses (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.67-1.60) was similar to mefloquine, while loading dose of tafenoquine alone (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.20-1.66) was associated with lower risk of AEs, although the difference was not statistically significant.

conclusionsFor short-term travellers, loading dose of tafenoquine alone was equally effective, had possibly lower rate of AEs, and likely better compliance than standard tafenoquine or mefloquine chemoprophylaxis schedules with maintenance doses. Studies are needed to confirm if short-term travellers remain free of infection after long-term follow-up. REGISTRATION: The meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021223756). HIGHLIGHT: Tafenoquine is the latest approved drug for malaria chemoprophylaxis. A loading dose of tafenoquine (200 mg/day for 3 days before departure) is as effective in preventing malaria in short-term (≤28 days) travellers as chemoprophylaxis schedules of tafenoquine or mefloquine with maintenance doses, allowing travellers to have a 'drug-free holiday'.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalariaAminoquinolinesHumansMefloquineTravelAminoquinolinesAntimalarialsMefloquinetafenoquineLoading dosemeta-analysisnetworksystematic reviewtraveltraveller

Identifiers

PMID33834208
OpenAlexW3147140780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.