ArticleCritical care explorations2021
Automated Near Real-Time Ventilator Data Feedback Reduces Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Events: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-evaluating the impact of ventilator-associated events on mortality in critically ill patients: insights from advanced causal modeling.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated Events, and Nosocomial Respiratory Viral Infections on the Leeside of the Pandemic.Respiratory care · 2024Review
- Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated events, and nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCritical care teams are encouraged to follow best practice protocols to help wean mechanically ventilated patients from the ventilator to reduce ventilator-associated events including ventilator-associated conditions, probable ventilator-associated pneumonias, and infection-related ventilator-associated conditions. Providers monitor for alerts suggestive of possible ventilator-associated events and advise when patients should undergo spontaneous breathing trials. Compliance with protocols in most units is suboptimal.
designRetrospective review of clinical data over 24 months.
settingSt. Joseph Mercy Hospital Candler Hospital Medical-Surgical ICU. PATIENTS: All mechanically ventilated patients.
interventionsThe Respiratory Knowledge Portal was implemented in our ICU. For 13 months, Respiratory Knowledge Portal data were ported to ICU workstations (control). For the following 11 months, Respiratory Knowledge Portal data were also presented on tablet computers (intervention) for use during multidisciplinary rounds. We performed a retrospective review of Respiratory Knowledge Portal data from before and after the implementation of the tablet computers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsData were collected from 337 patients (187 control group, 150 intervention group). A decrease in the occurrence of ventilator-associated events was observed during the intervention group compared with the control group. Only 2.0% of patients in the intervention group experienced any category of ventilator-associated event, while 11.2% of patients in the control group experienced one event (
conclusionsFewer ventilator-associated events, ventilator-associated conditions, infection-related ventilator-associated conditions, and probable ventilator-associated pneumonias were seen during the period when Respiratory Knowledge Portal monitoring data was presented on tablet computers. There was no difference in time on ventilator nor overall length of stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.