Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33834058›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of reproductive medicine2021

Attitudes and Practices of Healthcare Professionals and Clinical Medical Students on Contraception: A Cross-Sectional Study in Cape Coast, Ghana.

Evans Kofi Agbeno, Joseph Osarfo, Betty Anane-Fenin, Emmanuel Kusi Achampong, Naa Adei Neequaye, Douglas Aninng Opoku, Mohammed Aliyu, Sebastian Ken-Amoah, Anthony Amanfo Ofori, Joycelyn A Ashong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of reproductive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evans Kofi AgbenoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1725-2944
Joseph OsarfoGhana Health Service, Asante Mampong Municipal Hospital, Asante Mampong, Ashanti Region, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5366-3997
Betty Anane-FeninDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-2159
Emmanuel Kusi AchampongDepartment of Medical Education and IT, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-7535
Naa Adei NeequayePrincess Marie Louise Children's Hospital, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0800-7448
Douglas Aninng OpokuSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-387X
Mohammed AliyuSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2770-8968
Sebastian Ken-AmoahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8293-6862
Anthony Amanfo OforiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-8141
Joycelyn A AshongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7090-8370
University of Cape Coast · GHKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHGhana Health Service · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare providers play a major role in the implementation of family planning policies. In Ghana, there has been a conscious effort to improve the knowledge of preservice and practicing health professionals on family planning. However, there have been concerns about the appropriateness of the attitudes and practices of these health cadres and, hence, their propensity to become barriers to the uptake of contraception in the general population. This study is aimed at assessing the attitudes and practices of healthcare workers and clinical-year medical students in contraceptives use, advocacy, and service provision.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among health workers and clinical-year medical students from January 1 to June 30, 2018. Variables assessed included sexual activity status, previous and current contraceptive use, and satisfaction with contraceptive use among others. Data from 400 self-administered, structured questionnaires comprising close- and open-ended questions was entered in SPSS version 22 and analysed using same. The variables assessed were presented as means, frequencies, and percentages.

resultsAbout 58% of the respondents were sexually active. Half of the participants (50.2%) had used a form of contraception before, with condoms and other barrier methods being the most preferred (67.7%). However, only 18% of respondents were on a form of contraceptive at the time of the survey. Four out of five (82.6%) of the users of these contraceptives were satisfied with their past use. A little over half of the participants had discussed contraception with their partners. Over four-fifths of participants thought family planning was beneficial and were willing to encourage others to use a method of family planning. Majority (63.7%) of the participants had had formal training in family planning, but only 72 (18%) were actively involved in the provision of family planning services.

conclusionsAlthough the attitudes of the health workers and trainees toward family planning were excellent generally, only a few were using a method of contraception at the time of the survey despite the fact that most of them were sexually active. There is a need to intensify communication on behaviour change towards contraception among health professionals and clinical-year medical students in order to strengthen their role as change agents in an effort to improve community uptake.

Identifiers

PMID33834058
PMCPMC8012129
OpenAlexW3137476705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.