Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33834042›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects.

Peng Liu, Qiaozhu Wang, Hongke Sun, Xinghua Qin, Qiangsun Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Electromechanical window as an integrative marker of remodeling and arrhythmic risk in biventricular vs. left bundle branch area pacing.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tissue attached to retrieved left bundle pacing leads: histopathological evaluation of tissue composition in relation to difficult lead advancement.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Implantation.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Concepts of Cardiac Dyssynchrony and Dynamic Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peng LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Qiaozhu WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Hongke SunDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xinghua QinSchool of Life Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Qiangsun ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliate Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac pacing is an effective therapy for treating patients with bradycardia due to sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block. However, traditional right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) causes electric and mechanical dyssynchrony, which is associated with increased risk for atrial arrhythmias and heart failure. Therefore, there is a need to develop a physiological pacing approach that activates the normal cardiac conduction and provides synchronized contraction of ventricles. Although His bundle pacing (HBP) has been widely used as a physiological pacing modality, it is limited by challenging implantation technique, unsatisfactory success rate in patients with wide QRS wave, high pacing capture threshold, and early battery depletion. Recently, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), defined as the capture of left bundle branch (LBB) via transventricular septal approach, has emerged as a newly physiological pacing modality. Results from early clinical studies have demonstrated LBBP's feasibility and safety, with rare complications and high success rate. Overall, this approach has been found to provide physiological pacing that guarantees electrical synchrony of the left ventricle with low pacing threshold. This was previously specifically characterized by narrow paced QRS duration, large R waves, fast synchronized left ventricular activation, and correction of left bundle branch block. Therefore, LBBP may be a potential alternative pacing modality for both RVAP and cardiac resynchronization therapy with HBP or biventricular pacing (BVP). However, the technique's widespread adaptation needs further validation to ascertain its safety and efficacy in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of LBBP.

Indexed as

cardiac resynchronization therapyleft bundle branch pacingpacemakerphysiological pacingright ventricular apical pacing

Identifiers

PMID33834042
PMCPMC8021709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.