Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33833988›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Individualized 3D-Printed Tissue Retraction Devices for Head and Neck Radiotherapy.

Christopher Herpel, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Thomas Held, Leo Christ, Kristin Lang, Martha Schwindling, Julius Moratin, Karim Zaoui, Tracy Moutsis, Peter Plinkert and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Intraoral stent for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D technology: an integrative review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christopher HerpelDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Franz Sebastian SchwindlingDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas HeldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Leo ChristDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristin LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martha SchwindlingDesign Studio M. Schwindling, Berlin, Germany.
Julius MoratinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karim ZaouiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tracy MoutsisDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter PlinkertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus HerfarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian FreudlspergerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter RammelsbergDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian AdebergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy for head and neck cancer may cause various oral sequelae, such as radiation-induced mucositis. To protect healthy tissue from irradiation, intraoral devices can be used. Current tissue retraction devices (TRDs) have to be either individually manufactured at considerable cost and time expenditure or they are limited in their variability. In this context, a 3D-printed, tooth-borne TRD might further facilitate clinical use.

methodsA novel approach for the manufacturing of TRDs is described and its clinical application is analysed retrospectively. The devices were virtually designed for fabrication by 3D-printing technology, enabling-in only a single printing design-caudal or bi-lateral tongue displacement, as well as stabilization of a tongue-out position. For a total of 10 patients undergoing radiotherapy of head and neck tumors, the devices were individually adapted after pre-fabrication. Technical and clinical feasibility was assessed along with patient adherence. Tissue spacing was calculated by volumetric analysis of tongue retraction. In one exemplary case, radiotherapy treatment plans before and after tissue displacement were generated and compared. The reproducibility of maxillomandibular relation at device re-positioning was quantified by repeated intraoral optical scanning in a voluntary participant.

results3D-printing was useful for the simplification of TRD manufacture, resulting in a total patient treatment time of less than 30 min. The devices were tolerated well by all tested patients over the entire radiation treatment period. No technical complications occurred with the devices. The TRDs caused an effective spacing of the healthy adjacent tissue, e.g., the tongue. Position changes of maxillomandibular relation were limited to a mean value of 98.1 µm ± 29.4 µm root mean square deviation between initial reference and follow-up positions.

conclusionsThe presented method allows a resource-efficient fabrication of individualized, tooth-bourne TRDs. A high reproducibility of maxillomandibular relation was found and the first clinical experiences underline the high potential of such devices for radiotherapy in the head and neck area.

Indexed as

3D printingadvances in managementHNSCCintraoral splintsoral stentsradiation therapytissue retractiontongue displacement

Identifiers

PMID33833988
PMCPMC8021903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.