ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019
Fluorescence lifetime imaging with a single-photon SPAD array using long overlapping gates: an experimental and theoretical study.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phasor-based widefield FLIM using a gated 512×512 single-photon SPAD imager.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
- Single-photon avalanche diode imagers in biophotonics: review and outlook.Light, science & applications · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing large arrays of single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) with on-chip time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) capabilities continues to be a difficult task due to stringent silicon real estate constraints, high data rates and system complexity. As an alternative to TCSPC, time-gated architectures have been proposed, where the numbers of photons detected within different time gates are used as a replacement to the usual time-resolved luminescence decay. However, because of technological limitations, the minimum gate length implement is on the order of nanoseconds, longer than most fluorophore lifetimes of interest. However, recent FLIM measurements have shown that it is mainly the gate step and rise/fall time, rather than its length, which determine lifetime resolution. In addition, the large number of photons captured by longer gates results in higher SNR. In this paper, we study the effects of using long, overlapping gates on lifetime extraction by phasor analysis, using a recently developed 512×512 time-gated SPAD array. The experiments used Cy3B, Rhodamine 6G and Atto550 dyes as test samples. The gate window length was varied between 11.3 ns and 23 ns while the gate step was varied between 17.86 ps and 3 ns. We validated the results with a standard TCSPC setup and investigated the case of multi-exponential samples through simulations. Results indicate that lifetime extraction is not degraded by the use of longer gates, nor is the ability to resolve multi-exponential decays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.