Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33833476›Full record

ArticleSociological methodology2019

Social Space Diffusion: Applications of a Latent Space Model to Diffusion with Uncertain Ties.

Jacob C Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociological methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jacob C FisherUniversity of Michigan.

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
T32 Administrative Supplement for Increase in Postdoc StipendsT32AG000139 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LYNCH, SCOTT M. · 1987 to 2017
$4.0M
Rural Family and Community Drug Abuse Prevention ProjectR01AA014702 · NIAAA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2003 to 2007
$3.0M
Friendship Networks and Emergence of Substance UseR01DA018225 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FEINBERG, MARK ETHAN · 2007 to 2017
$2.9M
Models and Tools for Dynamic Health-Relevant Diffusion over Complex NetworksR01HD075712 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES, MUCHA, PETER JOHN · 2013 to 2018
$1.8M
Focused Training in Social Networks and HealthR25HD079352 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES · 2015 to 2024
$1.6M
Explanations of Racial Disparities in Active LifeR03HD050374 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI LYNCH, SCOTT M · 2005 to 2006
$156k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014702NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000139NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075712NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD050374NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD079352NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social networks represent two different facets of social life: (1) stable paths for diffusion, or the spread of something through a connected population, and (2) random draws from an underlying social space, which indicate the relative positions of the people in the network to one another. The dual nature of networks creates a challenge - if the observed network ties are a single random draw, is it realistic to expect that diffusion only follows the observed network ties? This study takes a first step towards integrating these two perspectives by introducing a social space diffusion model. In the model, network ties indicate positions in social space, and diffusion occurs proportionally to distance in social space. Practically, the simulation occurs in two parts. First, positions are estimated using a statistical model (in this example, a latent space model). Then, second, the predicted probabilities of a tie from that model - representing the distances in social space - or a series of networks drawn from those probabilities - representing routine churn in the network - are used as weights in a weighted averaging framework. Using longitudinal data from high school friendship networks, I explore the properties of the model. I show that the model produces smoothed diffusion results, which predict attitudes in future waves 10% better than a diffusion model using the observed network, and up to 5% better than diffusion models using alternative, non-model-based smoothing approaches.

Identifiers

PMID33833476
PMCPMC8025911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.