Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33833444›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2021

Industrializing engineered autologous T cells as medicines for solid tumours.

Cedrik M Britten, Aiman Shalabi, Axel Hoos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A quest for stakeholder synchronization in the CAR T-cell therapy supply chain.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical translation of immunomodulatory therapeutics.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cedrik M BrittenOncology R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
Aiman ShalabiOncology R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Axel HoosOncology R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA. axel.x.hoos@gsk.com.
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy is one of the fastest growing areas in the pharmaceutical industry, with considerable therapeutic potential. However, substantial challenges regarding the utility of these therapies will need to be addressed before they can become mainstream medicines with applicability similar to that of small molecules or monoclonal antibodies. Engineered T cells have achieved success in the treatment of blood cancers, with four chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies now approved for the treatment of B cell malignancies based on their unprecedented efficacy in clinical trials. However, similar results have not yet been achieved in the treatment of the much larger patient population with solid tumours. For cell therapies to become mainstream medicines, they may need to offer transformational clinical effects for patients and be applicable in disease settings that remain unaddressed by simpler approaches. This Perspective provides an industry perspective on the progress achieved by engineered T cell therapies to date and the opportunities and current barriers for accessing broader patient populations, and discusses the solutions and new development strategies required to fully industrialize the therapeutic potential of engineered T cells as medicines.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID33833444
OpenAlexW3143387571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.