Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33833416›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2022

Referral thresholds for an integrated learning disability eye care pathway: a consensus approach.

Rachel F Pilling, Lisa Donaldson, Marek Karas, R Jane Leitch, Howard Bunting, Ravi Naru, Gordon Ilett

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel F PillingSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, BD7 1DP, Bradford, UK. Rachel.pilling@bthft.nhs.uk.
Lisa DonaldsonSeeAbility, Newplan House, 41 East Street, Epsom, Surrey, KT17 1BL, UK.
Marek KarasSeeAbility, Newplan House, 41 East Street, Epsom, Surrey, KT17 1BL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9939-6604
R Jane LeitchDepartment of Ophthalmology, ESTH University Hospitals Trust St Helier Hospital Wrythe Lane, Carshalton, SM5 1AA, UK.
Howard BuntingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, BR6 8ND, UK.
Ravi NaruRavi Naru Opticians, Bradford, BD18 3TJ, UK.
Gordon IlettSeeAbility, Newplan House, 41 East Street, Epsom, Surrey, KT17 1BL, UK.
Cardiff University · GBPrincess Royal University Hospital · GBSevenoaks Hospital · GBSt Helier Hospital · GBUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLocal Optometric Support Unit (LOCSU) have published their refreshed clinical pathway for eye care for people with a learning disability. The document sets out the adjustments to practice that a community optometrist might make in order to provide optimal care for a person with learning disability attending a primary eye care assessment. The pathway specifically points to the need to retain patients in primary care where appropriate and 'reduce the number of people with learning disability who are inappropriately referred into the Hospital Eye Service (HES).' Pivotal to this refreshed pathway is the integration with secondary care, with local arrangements to facilitate referral and hospital management where appropriate. There are few ophthalmologists nationally who frequently encounter patients with a learning disability in their hospital practice and knowing where to start when creating referral criteria or KPIs may create a barrier to services becoming established. In order to address this gap in experience, we set about developing a set of consensus statements regarding referral thresholds for ocular conditions commonly encountered in adults with learning disability.

methodA series of video interviews were undertaken with eye health professionals with a range of experience in eye care for people with learning disability. Each contributor commented on the usability and clarity of each element of the referral criteria. In addition, each contributor was asked to express the overriding principles by which they make decisions regarding referral thresholds for patients with learning disability. These were collated into the final document which was circulated and agreed by all participants.

resultsA table setting out referral thresholds for commonly encountered eye conditions in adults with learning disabilities is presented.

conclusionWe have presented a succinct set of consensus statements relating referral thresholds for common presentations of visual problems in adults with learning disability in the UK distilled from the collective experience of a group of eye health professionals. The intention was not to present a comprehensive review of management of each condition. Rather, the consensus statements may form the starting point from which each area could develop locally agreed criteria, as is suggested by the LOCSU pathway guidance.

Indexed as

Learning DisabilitiesOptometristsOptometryAdultCritical PathwaysHumansReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID33833416
PMCPMC8956602
OpenAlexW3144012195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.