ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021
Development of a multivariable prediction model for severe COVID-19 disease: a population-based study from Hong Kong.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- A pooled analysis of the incidence and mortality risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with COVID-19.PeerJ · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic models in COVID-19 infection that predict severity: a systematic review.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of Warfarin on the Risks of Mortality, Acute Heart Failure, and Infection Resolution in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Target Trial Emulation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Comparing conventional and Bayesian workflows for clinical outcome prediction modelling with an exemplar cohort study of severe COVID-19 infection incorporating clinical biomarker test results.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Observational
- Utilizing machine learning to predict hospital admissions for pediatric COVID-19 patients (PrepCOVID-Machine).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The association between baseline viral load and long-term risk in patients with COVID-19 in Hong Kong: a territory-wide study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction models for respiratory outcomes in patients with COVID-19: integration of quantitative computed tomography parameters, demographics, and laboratory features.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of COVID-19 mortality using immunological and metabolic biomarkers.BMC digital health · 2023Article
- Risk Factors of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Hong Kong Diabetes Study.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2022Article
- Comparisons of the risk of myopericarditis between COVID-19 patients and individuals receiving COVID-19 vaccines: a population-based study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Article
- The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Data science approaches to confronting the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022Review
- Haematological and radiological-based prognostic markers of COVID-19.Journal of infection and public health · 2021Article
- Mental and neurological disorders and risk of COVID-19 susceptibility, illness severity and mortality: A systematic review, meta-analysis and call for action.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- High-density lipoprotein cholesterol: A marker of COVID-19 infection severity?Atherosclerosis plus · 2021Review
- Development of a predictive risk model for all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes in Hong Kong.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2021Article
- Routine Hematological Parameters May Be Predictors of COVID-19 Severity.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have reported numerous predictors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 disease. However, there have been few simple clinical risk scores available for prompt risk stratification. The objective is to develop a simple risk score for predicting severe COVID-19 disease using territory-wide data based on simple clinical and laboratory variables. Consecutive patients admitted to Hong Kong's public hospitals between 1 January and 22 August 2020 and diagnosed with COVID-19, as confirmed by RT-PCR, were included. The primary outcome was composite intensive care unit admission, need for intubation or death with follow-up until 8 September 2020. An external independent cohort from Wuhan was used for model validation. COVID-19 testing was performed in 237,493 patients and 4442 patients (median age 44.8 years old, 95% confidence interval (CI): [28.9, 60.8]); 50% males) were tested positive. Of these, 209 patients (4.8%) met the primary outcome. A risk score including the following components was derived from Cox regression: gender, age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, dementia, liver diseases, gastrointestinal bleeding, cancer, increases in neutrophil count, potassium, urea, creatinine, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin, D-dimer, high sensitive troponin-I, lactate dehydrogenase, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and C-reactive protein, as well as decreases in lymphocyte count, platelet, hematocrit, albumin, sodium, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, cholesterol, glucose, and base excess. The model based on test results taken on the day of admission demonstrated an excellent predictive value. Incorporation of test results on successive time points did not further improve risk prediction. The derived score system was evaluated with out-of-sample five-cross-validation (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.91) and external validation (N = 202, AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.93). A simple clinical score accurately predicted severe COVID-19 disease, even without including symptoms, blood pressure or oxygen status on presentation, or chest radiograph results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.