Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33833388›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Development of a multivariable prediction model for severe COVID-19 disease: a population-based study from Hong Kong.

Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Xiansong Wang, Yi Li, William Ka Kei Wu, Tong Liu, Zhidong Cao, Daniel Dajun Zeng, Keith Sai Kit Leung, Abraham Ka Chung Wai and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Data science approaches to confronting the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Haematological and radiological-based prognostic markers of COVID-19.Journal of infection and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jiandong ZhouSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3780-9033
Sharen LeeCardiovascular Analytics Group, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology, Hong Kong, China.
Xiansong WangLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Hong Kong, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan, China.
William Ka Kei WuLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Hong Kong, China.
Tong LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Zhidong CaoInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Daniel Dajun ZengInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Keith Sai Kit LeungEmergency Medicine Unit, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4232-763X
Abraham Ka Chung WaiEmergency Medicine Unit, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Ian Chi Kei WongDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Bernard Man Yung CheungDepartment of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Qingpeng ZhangSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. qingpeng.zhang@cityu.edu.hk.
Gary TseTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. garytse@tmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-1253
University of Hong Kong · HKChinese Academy of Sciences · CNCity University of Hong Kong · HKSecond Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CNUniversity College London · GBWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have reported numerous predictors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 disease. However, there have been few simple clinical risk scores available for prompt risk stratification. The objective is to develop a simple risk score for predicting severe COVID-19 disease using territory-wide data based on simple clinical and laboratory variables. Consecutive patients admitted to Hong Kong's public hospitals between 1 January and 22 August 2020 and diagnosed with COVID-19, as confirmed by RT-PCR, were included. The primary outcome was composite intensive care unit admission, need for intubation or death with follow-up until 8 September 2020. An external independent cohort from Wuhan was used for model validation. COVID-19 testing was performed in 237,493 patients and 4442 patients (median age 44.8 years old, 95% confidence interval (CI): [28.9, 60.8]); 50% males) were tested positive. Of these, 209 patients (4.8%) met the primary outcome. A risk score including the following components was derived from Cox regression: gender, age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, dementia, liver diseases, gastrointestinal bleeding, cancer, increases in neutrophil count, potassium, urea, creatinine, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin, D-dimer, high sensitive troponin-I, lactate dehydrogenase, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and C-reactive protein, as well as decreases in lymphocyte count, platelet, hematocrit, albumin, sodium, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, cholesterol, glucose, and base excess. The model based on test results taken on the day of admission demonstrated an excellent predictive value. Incorporation of test results on successive time points did not further improve risk prediction. The derived score system was evaluated with out-of-sample five-cross-validation (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.91) and external validation (N = 202, AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.93). A simple clinical score accurately predicted severe COVID-19 disease, even without including symptoms, blood pressure or oxygen status on presentation, or chest radiograph results.

Identifiers

PMID33833388
PMCPMC8032826
OpenAlexW3134611703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.