Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33832823›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2021

Prostate Cancer Detection Using 3-D Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.

D Cody Morris, Derek Y Chan, Mark L Palmeri, Thomas J Polascik, Wen-Chi Foo, Kathryn R Nightingale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Optimization of the Tracking Beam Sequence in Harmonic Motion Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D Cody MorrisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: cody.morris@duke.edu.
Derek Y ChanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mark L PalmeriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Thomas J PolascikDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Wen-Chi FooDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kathryn R NightingaleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Radiation Force Imaging of Prostate Cancer and Guidance of Biopsy ProceduresR01CA142824 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGHTINGALE, KATHRYN RADABAUGH · 2010 to 2021
$4.4M
Training in Medical ImagingT32EB001040 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGHTINGALE, KATHRYN RADABAUGH · 2003 to 2018
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142824NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) B-mode imaging provides insufficient sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer (PCa) targeting when used for biopsy guidance. Shear wave elasticity imaging (SWEI) is an elasticity imaging technique that has been commercially implemented and is sensitive and specific for PCa. We have developed a SWEI system capable of 3-D data acquisition using a dense acoustic radiation force (ARF) push approach that leads to enhanced shear wave signal-to-noise ratio compared with that of the commercially available SWEI systems and facilitates screening of the entire gland before biopsy. Additionally, we imaged and assessed 36 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using 3-D SWEI and determined a shear wave speed threshold separating PCa from healthy prostate tissue with sensitivities and specificities akin to those for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy. The approach measured the mean shear wave speed in each prostate region to be 4.8 m/s (Young's modulus E = 69.1 kPa) in the peripheral zone, 5.3 m/s (E = 84.3 kPa) in the central gland and 6.0 m/s (E = 108.0 kPa) for PCa with statistically significant (p < 0.0001) differences among all regions. Three-dimensional SWEI receiver operating characteristic analyses identified a threshold of 5.6 m/s (E = 94.1 kPa) to separate PCa from healthy tissue with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) of 81%, 82%, 69%, 89% and 0.84, respectively. Additionally, a shear wave speed ratio was assessed to normalize for tissue compression and patient variability, which yielded a threshold of 1.11 to separate PCa from healthy prostate tissue and was accompanied by a substantial increase in specificity, PPV and AUC, where the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC were 75%, 90%, 79%, 88% and 0.90, respectively. This work illustrates the feasibility of using 3-D SWEI data to detect and localize PCa and demonstrates the benefits of normalizing for applied compression during data acquisition for use in biopsy targeting studies.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAcoustic radiation force impulse imagingElasticity imagingProstate cancerShear wave elasticity imaging

Identifiers

PMID33832823
PMCPMC8169635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.