Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33832455›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

From income inequality to social inequity: impact on health levels in an international efficiency comparison panel.

Simone Schenkman, Aylene Bousquat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simone SchenkmanDepartment of Policies, Management and Health, Faculdade de Saúde Pública - FSP (School of Public Health), Universidade de São Paulo - USP (Sao Paulo University), Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil. simoneschenkman16@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1140-1056
Aylene BousquatDepartment of Policies, Management and Health, Faculdade de Saúde Pública - FSP (School of Public Health), Universidade de São Paulo - USP (Sao Paulo University), Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-1570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth equity, although addressed in several publications dealing with health efficiency analysis, is not easily translated into the operationalization of variables, mainly due to technical difficulties. Some studies provide evidence that it does not influence health outcomes; others demonstrate that its effect is an indirect one, with the hegemony of material living conditions over its social connotation. The aim of this article is to evaluate the role of health equity in determining health outcomes, in an international comparative analysis of the effectiveness and efficiency of health systems.

methodFixed Effects Model Panel and Data Envelopment Analysis, a dynamic and network model, in addition to comparative analysis between methods and health impacts. The effect variables considered in the study were life expectancy at birth and infant mortality, in 2010 and 2015, according to the sociocultural regions of the selected countries. Inequity was assessed both economically and socially. The following dimensions were considered: physical and financial resources, health production (access, coverage and prevention) and intersectoral variables: demographic, socioeconomic, governance and health risks.

resultsBoth methods demonstrated that countries with higher inequity levels (regarding income, education and health dimensions), associated or not with poverty, are the least efficient, not reaching the potential for effective health outcomes. The outcome life expectancy at birth exhibited, in the final model, the following variables: social inequity and per capita health expenditure. The outcome infant mortality comprehended the level of education variable, in association with the following healthcare variabels: care seeking due to diarrhea in children under five, births attended by skilled health professionals and the reduction in the incidence of HIV.

conclusionThe dissociation between the distribution of health outcomes and the overall level of health of the population characterizes a devastating political choice for society, as it is associated with high levels of segregation, disrespect and violence from within. Countries should prioritize health equity, adding value to its resources, since health inequties affect society altogether, generating mistrust and reduced social cohesion.

Indexed as

IncomeLife ExpectancyChildEducational StatusHealth StatusHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPovertySocioeconomic FactorsCapitalismData envelopment analysis (DEA)EffectivenessEfficiencyHealth equityHealth systemsIncome inequalityInfant mortalityLife expectancy at birthPanel analysis

Identifiers

PMID33832455
PMCPMC8033748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.