Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33832130›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

Association between MMP-2 gene polymorphism and cataract susceptibility: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huaiyan Jiang, Yang Gao, Zhen Chen, Hongxia Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Huaiyan JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Kunhua Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China.
Yang Gao
Zhen Chen
Hongxia Xu
Weatherford College · US

Funding

Inoue Real expert Workstation in Yunnan Province 201905F150135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMatrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) polymorphisms have been considered as risk factors of cataracts, but the results still remain controversial. In this study, we have performed a systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the association between MMP-2 polymorphisms and cataract risks.

methodsPublished literature was retrieved from Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The case-control studies that explored the association between MMP-2 polymorphisms and cataract risks were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects model.

resultsThis study could provide high-quality and evidence-based medical evidence for the correlation between MMP-2 polymorphisms and cataract risks.

conclusionThe study could provide updated evidence for the evaluation of the relationship between MMP-2 polymorphism and cataract risk. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The private information from individuals will not be published. This systematic review also will not involve endangering participant rights. Ethical approval is not available. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated in relevant conferences. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/KU9NE.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCataractChinaData ManagementGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Meta-Analysis as TopicOdds RatioPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSystematic Reviews as TopicMatrix Metalloproteinase 2

Identifiers

PMID33832130
PMCPMC8036040
OpenAlexW3148562132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.