ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2021
Improved Recognition of Maternal Deaths Using Modern Data Analytics.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo use a data-fusion approach to improve ascertainment of maternal deaths not detected with standard surveillance strategies.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study from the electronic health records of a tertiary medical center from 2011 to 2018. Cases of maternal death were identified in two ways: 1) using a standard medical informatics service query of hospital data and 2) using the TriNetX discovery tool as patients with a vital status of "deceased" and evidence of antecedent pregnancy exposure based on such factors as obstetric diagnostic codes or obstetric-related procedures. Potential cases of maternal death identified by the latter method underwent chart review to confirm timing of death compared with timing of last appreciable pregnancy, and to characterize the details of these deaths. The primary outcome was pregnancy-associated mortality during pregnancy or within the first postpartum year in the discovery cohort compared with the hospital-identified cohort. Secondary outcomes included causes of death and comorbidities.
resultsDuring the study period, the standard service query identified 23 maternal deaths. The discovery tool identified 18 additional patients confirmed on subsequent chart review to represent pregnancy-associated deaths, a 78% increase in ascertainment of which a greater proportion represented postpartum deaths. The majority (61%) of newly ascertained mortalities were related to cardiac causes or other medical comorbidities. Although many hospital-ascertained cases were associated with deaths after delivery of a living newborn, more deaths after early pregnancy loss or termination were identified through the discovery tool.
conclusionImproved recognition of pregnancy-associated deaths can be achieved with modern data analytics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.