Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831915›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2021

Association of Patient Sex and Pregnancy Status With Naloxone Administration During Emergency Department Visits.

Lauren A Forbes, Joseph K Canner, Lorraine Milio, Torre Halscott, Arthur Jason Vaught

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hospital Care for Pregnant Persons With OUD Review.American journal of medicine open · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren A ForbesJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; the Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; and the Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and the Division of Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Joseph K Canner
Lorraine Milio
Torre Halscott
Arthur Jason Vaught
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

QAQC Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR003098 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2019 to 2023
$57.7M
The Johns Hopkins Clinical Research Scholars in Women's Health (BIRCWH)K12HD085845 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2015 to 2023
$4.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003098NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD085845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association of sex and pregnancy status with rates of naloxone administration during opioid overdose-related emergency department (ED) visits by using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2016 and 2017 data sets. Eligible records included men and women, 15-49 years of age, with an opioid overdose-related ED visit; records for women were stratified by pregnancy status (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision O codes). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the primary outcome of naloxone administration (Current Procedural Terminology code: J2310). Secondary outcomes included subsequent admission and mortality. A subgroup analysis compared pregnant women who did receive naloxone compared with those who did not receive naloxone.

resultsRecords from 443,714 men, 304,364 nonpregnant women, and 25,056 pregnant women were included. Nonpregnant women had lower odds for naloxone administration (1.70% vs 2.10%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.86 [95% CI 0.83-0.89]) and mortality (2.21% vs 2.99%; aOR 0.71 [95% CI 0.69-0.73]) but higher odds of subsequent admission (30.22% vs 27.18%; aOR 1.04 [95% CI 1.03-1.06]) compared with men. Pregnant women had lower odds for naloxone administration (0.27% vs 1.70%; aOR 0.16 [95% CI 0.13-0.21]) and mortality (0.41% vs 2.21%; aOR 0.28 [95% CI 0.23-0.35]) but higher odds of subsequent admission (40.50% vs 30.22%; aOR 2.04 [95% CI 2.00-2.10]) compared with nonpregnant women. Pregnant women who received naloxone had higher odds of mortality (14% vs 0.39%; aOR 6.30 [95% CI 2.11-18.78]) compared with pregnant women who did not receive naloxone. Pregnant women who did not receive naloxone were more likely to have Medicaid as their expected insurance payer, be in the lowest quartile of median household income for residence ZIP codes, and have a concurrent mental health diagnosis compared with pregnant women who did receive naloxone.

conclusionReproductive-aged women who are nonpregnant and pregnant were less likely to receive naloxone during opioid overdose-related ED visits compared with reproductive-aged men. Naloxone administration for reproductive-aged women should be prioritized in the efforts to reduce opioid- and pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality in the United States.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID33831915
PMCPMC8058255
OpenAlexW3151724442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.