ArticleClinical imaging2021
Pediatric radiologic manifestations of COVID-19.
Article in Clinical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SARS-CoV-2 paediatric chest X-ray findings during the Omicron variant wave.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Imaging findings in acute pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile full description of pediatric COVID-19 manifestations is evolving, children appear to present less frequently, and often display a less severe disease phenotype. There is correspondingly less data regarding pediatric radiologic findings. To describe the imaging findings of pediatric COVID-19, we evaluated the radiologic imaging of the initial patient cohort identified at our institution.
methodsIn this IRB approved study, all patients at our institution aged 0-21 with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) based on PCR or immunoglobulin testing were identified. Imaging was reviewed by the co-authors and presence of abnormalities determined by consensus. Pre-existing comorbidities and alternative diagnoses were recorded. Rates of each finding were calculated. Findings were compared to published data following review of the available literature.
resultsOut of 130 Covid-19 positive patients, 24 patients underwent imaging, including 21 chest radiographs and 4 chest CT scans. Chest x-rays were normal in 33%. Patchy or streaky opacities were the most common radiographic abnormality, each seen in 38% of patients. CT findings included ill-defined or geographic ground glass opacities, dense opacities, septal thickening and crazy paving, and small pleural effusions. Results are similar to those reported in adults. Multiple COVID-19 positive children presented for symptoms due to an additional acute illness, including appendicitis and urinary infection.
conclusionsRadiologic findings of COVID-19 in pediatric patients range from normal to severe ARDS type appearance. During this ongoing pandemic, these radiographic signs can be useful for the evaluation of disease status and guiding care, particularly in those with comorbidities. PRECIS: Radiologic findings of COVID-19 in pediatric patients are similar to those seen in adults, and may range from normal to severe ARDS type appearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.