ArticleHeart rhythm2021
Strategy after vein of Marshall ethanol infusion added to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: Please follow the line.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial experiences of surgical left atrial maze through resected left atrial appendage.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Isolation of left pulmonary veins by ethanol injection in the vein of Marshall.HeartRhythm case reports · 2024Article
- Repeat procedures for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation: A propensity-matched score comparison between left atrial linear ablation with radiofrequency and posterior wall isolation with the cryoballoon.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33831544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.