Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831104›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Low vs standardized dose anticoagulation regimens for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis.

Xiaochai Lv, Manjun Deng, Lei Wang, Yi Dong, Liangwan Chen, Xiaofu Dai

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Anticoagulation in ECMO: Target Values to Reduce Hemorrhagic Complications in Adults. A Retrospective Cohort Study.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Current status of ECMO for massive pulmonary embolism.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  20. Anticoagulation Management in High Bleeding-Risk ECMO in Adults.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaochai LvDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.
Manjun DengDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.
Yi DongDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.
Liangwan ChenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0387-3651
Xiaofu DaiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the safety and efficacy of low-dose anticoagulation (LA) with that of standardized dose anticoagulation (SA) for patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

methodsPubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were screened for original articles. Screening was performed using predefined search terms to identify cohort studies reporting the comparison of LA with SA in patients supported with ECMO from Nov 1990 to Jun 2020. The effect size was determined by the odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsAn analysis of 7 studies including a total of 553 patients was performed. LA (Low-heparin group) was administered to 255 patients, whereas the other 298 patients received SA (Full-heparin group). The incidence of gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.64) and surgical site hemorrhage (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.94) were significantly lower in patients who underwent LA compared with that in those who underwent SA. The rates of hospital mortality (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.42-1.56), successfully weaning off of ECMO (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.30-2.14), pulmonary embolism (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.24-2.65), intracardiac thrombus (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.09-1.30), intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.22-1.74), and pulmonary hemorrhage (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.30-1.93) were similar between the two groups.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis confirms that LA is a feasible and safe anticoagulation strategy in patients supported by ECMO. Future studies should focus on the long-term benefits of LA compared with SA.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeparinHumansAnticoagulantsHeparin

Identifiers

PMID33831104
PMCPMC8031334
OpenAlexW3152200168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.