Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831098›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Predictive utility of task-related functional connectivity vs. voxel activation.

Christian Habeck, Qolamreza Razlighi, Yaakov Stern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian HabeckCognitive Neuroscience Division, Department of Neurology, and Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, and G.H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9961-7446
Qolamreza RazlighiDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Brain Health Imaging Institute, New York, NY, United States of America.
Yaakov SternCognitive Neuroscience Division, Department of Neurology, and Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, and G.H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative · USCornell University · US

Funding

Exploring Cognitive Aging Using Reference Ability Neural NetworksR01AG038465 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HABECK, CHRISTIAN GEORG, STERN, YAAKOV · 2011 to 2025
$17.0M
Imaging of Cognition, Learning and Memory in AgingR01AG026158 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STERN, YAAKOV · 2004 to 2021
$10.9M
Exploring Cognitive Aging Using Refernce Ability Neural NetworksRF1AG038465 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HABECK, CHRISTIAN GEORG, STERN, YAAKOV · 2016 to 2018
$7.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026158NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038465NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG038465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity, both in resting state and task performance, has steadily increased its share of neuroimaging research effort in the last 1.5 decades. In the current study, we investigated the predictive utility regarding behavioral performance and task information for 240 participants, aged 20-77, for both voxel activation and functional connectivity in 12 cognitive tasks, belonging to 4 cognitive reference domains (Episodic Memory, Fluid Reasoning, Perceptual Speed, and Vocabulary). We also added a model only comprising brain-structure information not specifically acquired during performance of a cognitive task. We used a simple brain-behavioral prediction technique based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and regression and studied the utility of both modalities in quasi out-of-sample predictions, using split-sample simulations (= 5-fold Monte Carlo cross validation) with 1,000 iterations for which a regression model predicting a cognitive outcome was estimated in a training sample, with a subsequent assessment of prediction success in a non-overlapping test sample. The sample assignments were identical for functional connectivity, voxel activation, and brain structure, enabling apples-to-apples comparisons of predictive utility. All 3 models that were investigated included the demographic covariates age, gender, and years of education. A minimal reference model using simple linear regression with just these 3 covariates was included for comparison as well and was evaluated with the same resampling scheme as described above. Results of the comparison between voxel activation and functional connectivity were mixed and showed some dependency on cognitive outcome; however, mean differences in predictive utility between voxel activation and functional connectivity were rather small in terms of within-modality variability or predictive success. More notably, only in the case of Fluid Reasoning did concurrent functional neuroimaging provided compelling about cognitive performance beyond structural brain imaging or the minimal reference model.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodPrincipal Component AnalysisRegression AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33831098
PMCPMC8031148
OpenAlexW3148820532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.