Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831088›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Global biochemical analysis of plasma, serum and whole blood collected using various anticoagulant additives.

Adam D Kennedy, Lisa Ford, Bryan Wittmann, Jesse Conner, Jacob Wulff, Matthew Mitchell, Anne M Evans, Douglas R Toal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Alterations of Plasma Metabolites Associated with Sickle Cell Trait.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Early Sepsis Metabolic Changes in Kidney and Liver Precede Clinical Evidence of Organ Dysfunction.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam D KennedyMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-9457
Lisa FordMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Bryan WittmannMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jesse ConnerMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jacob WulffMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Matthew MitchellMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Anne M EvansMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Douglas R ToalMetabolon, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Metabolon (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnalysis of blood for the evaluation of clinically relevant biomarkers requires precise collection and sample handling by phlebotomists and laboratory staff. An important consideration for the clinical application of metabolomics are the different anticoagulants utilized for sample collection. Most studies that have characterized differences in metabolite levels in various blood collection tubes have focused on single analytes. We define analyte levels on a global metabolomics platform following blood sampling using five different, but commonly used, clinical laboratory blood collection tubes (i.e., plasma anticoagulated with either EDTA, lithium heparin or sodium citrate, along with no additive (serum), and EDTA anticoagulated whole blood).

methodsUsing an untargeted metabolomics platform we analyzed five sample types after all had been collected and stored at -80°C. The biochemical composition was determined and differences between the samples established using matched-pair t-tests.

resultsWe identified 1,117 biochemicals across all samples and detected a mean of 1,036 in the sample groups. Compared to the levels of metabolites in EDTA plasma, the number of biochemicals present at statistically significant different levels (p<0.05) ranged from 452 (serum) to 917 (whole blood). Several metabolites linked to screening assays for rare diseases including acylcarnitines, bilirubin and heme metabolites, nucleosides, and redox balance metabolites varied significantly across the sample collection types.

conclusionsOur study highlights the widespread effects and importance of using consistent additives for assessing small molecule levels in clinical metabolomics. The biochemistry that occurs during the blood collection process creates a reproducible signal that can identify specimens collected with different anticoagulants in metabolomic studies. IMPACT STATEMENT: In this manuscript, normal/healthy donors had peripheral blood collected using multiple anticoagulants as well as serum during a fasted blood draw. Global metabolomics is a new technology being utilized to draw clinical conclusions and we interrogated the effects of different anticoagulants on the levels of biochemicals from each of the donors. Characterizing the effects of the anticoagulants on biochemical levels will help researchers leverage the information using global metabolomics in order to make conclusions regarding important disease biomarkers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticoagulantsBiomarkersBlood Specimen CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedPlasmaSerumSpecimen HandlingYoung AdultAnticoagulantsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33831088
PMCPMC8031419
OpenAlexW3151725375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.