Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831062›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effects of supplemental feeding on the fecal bacterial communities of Rocky Mountain elk in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Claire E Couch, Benjamin L Wise, Brandon M Scurlock, Jared D Rogerson, Rebecca K Fuda, Eric K Cole, Kimberly E Szcodronski, Adam J Sepulveda, Patrick R Hutchins, Paul C Cross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claire E CouchDepartment of Fisheries & Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4983-3719
Benjamin L WiseWyoming Game & Fish Department, Jackson, Wyoming, United States of America.
Brandon M ScurlockWyoming Game & Fish Department, Jackson, Wyoming, United States of America.
Jared D RogersonWyoming Game & Fish Department, Pinedale, Wyoming, United States of America.
Rebecca K FudaOregon Department of Fish & Wildlife, Prineville, Oregon, United States of America.
Eric K ColeU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, National Elk Refuge, Jackson, Wyoming, United States of America.
Kimberly E SzcodronskiU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Adam J SepulvedaU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
Patrick R HutchinsU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-0821
Paul C CrossU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
United States Geological Survey · USWyoming Game and Fish Department · USOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife · USUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supplemental feeding of wildlife is a common practice often undertaken for recreational or management purposes, but it may have unintended consequences for animal health. Understanding cryptic effects of diet supplementation on the gut microbiomes of wild mammals is important to inform conservation and management strategies. Multiple laboratory studies have demonstrated the importance of the gut microbiome for extracting and synthesizing nutrients, modulating host immunity, and many other vital host functions, but these relationships can be disrupted by dietary perturbation. The well-described interplay between diet, the microbiome, and host health in laboratory and human systems highlights the need to understand the consequences of supplemental feeding on the microbiomes of free-ranging animal populations. This study describes changes to the gut microbiomes of wild elk under different supplemental feeding regimes. We demonstrated significant cross-sectional variation between elk at different feeding locations and identified several relatively low-abundance bacterial genera that differed between fed versus unfed groups. In addition, we followed four of these populations through mid-season changes in supplemental feeding regimes and demonstrated a significant shift in microbiome composition in a single population that changed from natural forage to supplementation with alfalfa pellets. Some of the taxonomic shifts in this population mirrored changes associated with ruminal acidosis in domestic livestock. We discerned no significant changes in the population that shifted from natural forage to hay supplementation, or in the populations that changed from one type of hay to another. Our results suggest that supplementation with alfalfa pellets alters the native gut microbiome of elk, with potential implications for population health.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal DiseasesAnimal FeedAnimalsAnimals, WildBacteriaDeerFeces

Identifiers

PMID33831062
PMCPMC8031386
OpenAlexW3148237602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.