Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831033›Full record

ReviewPloS one2021

Applying model approaches in non-model systems: A review and case study on coral cell culture.

Liza M Roger, Hannah G Reich, Evan Lawrence, Shuaifeng Li, Whitney Vizgaudis, Nathan Brenner, Lokender Kumar, Judith Klein-Seetharaman, Jinkyu Yang, Hollie M Putnam and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Liza M RogerLife Science and Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2274-8311
Hannah G ReichDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Evan LawrenceLife Science and Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Shuaifeng LiAeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Whitney VizgaudisDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, United States of America.
Nathan BrennerDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, United States of America.
Lokender KumarDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, United States of America.
Judith Klein-SeetharamanDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, United States of America.
Jinkyu YangAeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Hollie M PutnamDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Nastassja A LewinskiLife Science and Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model systems approaches search for commonality in patterns underlying biological diversity and complexity led by common evolutionary paths. The success of the approach does not rest on the species chosen but on the scalability of the model and methods used to develop the model and engage research. Fine-tuning approaches to improve coral cell cultures will provide a robust platform for studying symbiosis breakdown, the calcification mechanism and its disruption, protein interactions, micronutrient transport/exchange, and the toxicity of nanoparticles, among other key biological aspects, with the added advantage of minimizing the ethical conundrum of repeated testing on ecologically threatened organisms. The work presented here aimed to lay the foundation towards development of effective methods to sort and culture reef-building coral cells with the ultimate goal of obtaining immortal cell lines for the study of bleaching, disease and toxicity at the cellular and polyp levels. To achieve this objective, the team conducted a thorough review and tested the available methods (i.e. cell dissociation, isolation, sorting, attachment and proliferation). The most effective and reproducible techniques were combined to consolidate culture methods and generate uncontaminated coral cell cultures for ~7 days (10 days maximum). The tests were conducted on scleractinian corals Pocillopora acuta of the same genotype to harmonize results and reduce variation linked to genetic diversity. The development of cell separation and identification methods in conjunction with further investigations into coral cell-type specific metabolic requirements will allow us to tailor growth media for optimized monocultures as a tool for studying essential reef-building coral traits such as symbiosis, wound healing and calcification at multiple scales.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthozoaCell Culture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID33831033
PMCPMC8031391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.