Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831015›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Factors associated with dietary diversity among pregnant women in the western hill region of Nepal: A community based cross-sectional study.

Vintuna Shrestha, Rajan Paudel, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Andrew L Thorne Lyman, Swetha Manohar, Archana Amatya

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vintuna ShresthaDepartment of Nursing, Dhaulagiri Prabhidhik Shikshya Pratisthan, Council for Technical Education and Vocational Training, Baglung, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-3977
Rajan PaudelCentral Department of Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-5450
Dev Ram SunuwarDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2544-8296
Andrew L Thorne LymanCenter for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Swetha ManoharCenter for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Archana AmatyaCentral Department of Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Johns Hopkins University · USTribhuvan University · NPCivil Service Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary diversity can play an important role in providing essential nutrients for both mother and fetus during pregnancy. This study aimed to assess the factors associated with dietary diversity during pregnancy in the western hill region of Nepal.

methodsA cross-sectional study of 327 pregnant women was conducted in an urban municipality of Baglung district in the western hill region of Nepal. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect information on household demographic and socioeconomic status, food taboos, household food security status, nutrition-related knowledge in pregnancy, and women's empowerment. Women consuming ≥5 of 10 food groups in the past 24 hours were defined as consuming a diverse diet using the Minimum Dietary Diversity Score for Women (MDD-W) tool. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate crude odds ratio (cOR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to understand factors associated with dietary diversity.

resultsAlmost 45% (95% CI: 39.6-50.4) of the participants did not consume a diverse diet and the mean dietary diversity score was 4.76 ± 1.23. Multivariable analysis revealed that women with greater empowerment (aOR = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.9-9.9), from wealthier households (aOR = 5.1, 95% CI: 2.7-9.3), joint families (aOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.4-5.1), employment (aOR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1), and had adequate nutrition knowledge (aOR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4) had higher odds of dietary diversity.

conclusionAlong with socioeconomic status, women's empowerment and nutrition knowledge were modifiable risk factors that should be considered as targets for programs to improve women's health during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFood PreferencesNutritional StatusPregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNepalPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33831015
PMCPMC8031299
OpenAlexW3144361202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.