Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33831003›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Risk assessment for airborne disease transmission by poly-pathogen aerosols.

Freja Nordsiek, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Gholamhossein Bagheri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. On modelling airborne infection risk.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Freja NordsiekMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Göttingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5185-3634
Eberhard BodenschatzMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Göttingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2901-0144
Gholamhossein BagheriMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Göttingen, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization · DECornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the case of airborne diseases, pathogen copies are transmitted by droplets of respiratory tract fluid that are exhaled by the infectious that stay suspended in the air for some time and, after partial or full drying, inhaled as aerosols by the susceptible. The risk of infection in indoor environments is typically modelled using the Wells-Riley model or a Wells-Riley-like formulation, usually assuming the pathogen dose follows a Poisson distribution (mono-pathogen assumption). Aerosols that hold more than one pathogen copy, i.e. poly-pathogen aerosols, break this assumption even if the aerosol dose itself follows a Poisson distribution. For the largest aerosols where the number of pathogen in each aerosol can sometimes be several hundred or several thousand, the effect is non-negligible, especially in diseases where the risk of infection per pathogen is high. Here we report on a generalization of the Wells-Riley model and dose-response models for poly-pathogen aerosols by separately modeling each number of pathogen copies per aerosol, while the aerosol dose itself follows a Poisson distribution. This results in a model for computational risk assessment suitable for mono-/poly-pathogen aerosols. We show that the mono-pathogen assumption significantly overestimates the risk of infection for high pathogen concentrations in the respiratory tract fluid. The model also includes the aerosol removal due to filtering by the individuals which becomes significant for poorly ventilated environments with a high density of individuals, and systematically includes the effects of facemasks in the infectious aerosol source and sink terms and dose calculations.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyModels, BiologicalAerosolsHumansParticle SizeRisk AssessmentAerosols

Identifiers

PMID33831003
PMCPMC8031403
OpenAlexW3143059355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.