ArticlePloS one2021
New methods for quantifying rapidity of action potential onset differentiate neuron types.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Designer indicators for two-photon recording of subthreshold voltage dynamics.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Article
- The impact of dynamic reversal potential on the evolution of action potential attributes during spike trains.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Two new methods for quantifying the rapidity of action potential onset have lower relative standard deviations and better distinguish neuron cell types than current methods. Action potentials (APs) in most central mammalian neurons exhibit sharp onset dynamics. The main views explaining such an abrupt onset differ. Some studies suggest sharp onsets reflect cooperative sodium channels activation, while others suggest they reflect AP backpropagation from the axon initial segment. However, AP onset rapidity is defined subjectively in these studies, often using the slope at an arbitrary value on the phase plot. Thus, we proposed more systematic methods using the membrane potential's second-time derivative ([Formula: see text]) peak width. Here, the AP rapidity was measured for four different cortical and hippocampal neuron types using four quantification methods: the inverse of full-width at the half maximum of the [Formula: see text] peak (IFWd2), the inverse of half-width at the half maximum of the [Formula: see text] peak (IHWd2), the phase plot slope, and the error ratio method. The IFWd2 and IHWd2 methods show the smallest variation among neurons of the same type. Furthermore, the AP rapidity, using the [Formula: see text] peak width methods, significantly differentiates between different types of neurons, indicating that AP rapidity can be used to classify neuron types. The AP rapidity measured using the IFWd2 method was able to differentiate between all four neuron types analyzed. Therefore, the [Formula: see text] peak width methods provide another sensitive tool to investigate the mechanisms impacting the AP onset dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.