Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33830944›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2021

Reactive astrocyte-driven epileptogenesis is induced by microglia initially activated following status epilepticus.

Fumikazu Sano, Eiji Shigetomi, Youichi Shinozaki, Haruka Tsuzukiyama, Kozo Saito, Katsuhiko Mikoshiba, Hiroshi Horiuchi, Dennis Lawrence Cheung, Junichi Nabekura, Kanji Sugita and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fumikazu SanoDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine.
Eiji ShigetomiDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine.
Youichi ShinozakiDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine.
Haruka TsuzukiyamaDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine.
Kozo SaitoDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine.
Katsuhiko MikoshibaShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Hiroshi HoriuchiDivision of Homeostatic Development, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Dennis Lawrence CheungDivision of Homeostatic Development, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Junichi NabekuraDivision of Homeostatic Development, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Kanji SugitaDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, and.
Masao AiharaDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, and.
Schuichi KoizumiDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine.
Institute of Genetic and Biomedical Research · ITNational Institute for Physiological Sciences · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPShanghaiTech University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive activation of glial cells during a latent period has been well documented in various animal models of epilepsy. However, it remains unclear whether activated glial cells contribute to epileptogenesis, i.e., the chronically persistent process leading to epilepsy. Particularly, it is not clear whether interglial communication between different types of glial cells contributes to epileptogenesis, because past literature has mainly focused on one type of glial cell. Here, we show that temporally distinct activation profiles of microglia and astrocytes collaboratively contributed to epileptogenesis in a drug-induced status epilepticus model. We found that reactive microglia appeared first, followed by reactive astrocytes and increased susceptibility to seizures. Reactive astrocytes exhibited larger Ca2+ signals mediated by IP3R2, whereas deletion of this type of Ca2+ signaling reduced seizure susceptibility after status epilepticus. Immediate, but not late, pharmacological inhibition of microglial activation prevented subsequent reactive astrocytes, aberrant astrocyte Ca2+ signaling, and the enhanced seizure susceptibility. These findings indicate that the sequential activation of glial cells constituted a cause of epileptogenesis after status epilepticus. Thus, our findings suggest that the therapeutic target to prevent epilepsy after status epilepticus should be shifted from microglia (early phase) to astrocytes (late phase).

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCalcium SignalingDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionDisease SusceptibilityEpilepsyGliosisInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsInterleukin-1betaMiceMicrogliaMuscarinic AgonistsOrganic ChemicalsPilocarpineReceptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorCsf1r protein, mouseIL1B protein, mouseInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsInterleukin-1betaIp3r2 protein, mouseMuscarinic AgonistsOrganic ChemicalsPilocarpinePLX5622Receptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorSodium Channel BlockersTetrodotoxinTnf protein, mouseTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCalcium signalingEpilepsyNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33830944
PMCPMC8262323
OpenAlexW3143243039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.