Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33830463›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2021

Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.

Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-Montoli, Jordi Sabadell, Nayanar-Adela Contreras-Perez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review: Sex-Specific Aspects in the Bariatric Treatment of Severely Obese Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ARG1 Is a Potential Prognostic Marker in Metastatic Endometrial Cancer.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-MontoliDepartment of Gynaecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain. mefernandez@bellvitgehospital.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1792-7545
Jordi SabadellDepartment of Gynaecology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jsabadell@vhebron.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9380-0338
Nayanar-Adela Contreras-PerezGynecology Department, Hospital El Pilar, Barcelona, Spain.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndometrial cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women and atypical endometrial hyperplasia is a precancerous lesion. Obesity is an important risk factor for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma and endometrial hyperplasia. Progesterone is recommended as first-line treatment in endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia in women who wish to preserve fertility, but optimal treatment schedules have not been defined. Metformin or bariatric surgery may also be useful in these women. The effectiveness and safety of fertility-preserving treatments being used for women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and stage IA grade 1 endometrial cancer is unclear. Therefore, the systematic review aims to determine this point.

methodsWe will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, trial registers, conference proceedings, abstracts, cooperative trial groups and reference lists. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare fertility-preserving therapy including orally administered progesterone versus a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS), metformin, other pharmacological interventions or bariatric surgery, and any of these interventions with womb-removing surgery. Quasi-randomised trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies will be included. Two review authors will independently assess study eligibility and risk of bias and extract data. The primary outcomes are complete pathologic response and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, progression-free survival, pregnancy rate, need for hysterectomy, adverse events, psychological symptoms and quality of life. PLANNED OUTCOMES: This review aims to clarify the effectiveness and risks of fertility-preserving treatments, including complete pathologic response rate, live birth rates, need for surgical treatment, adverse events, psychological symptoms and quality of life. The broad scope of the review includes the use of progesterone, metformin to reverse insulin resistance, and bariatric surgery or operative hysteroscopy.

resultsThe results may help to determine the optimal fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Prospero 2019 number CRD42019145991.

Indexed as

Endometrial HyperplasiaEndometrial NeoplasmsIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedFemaleHumansHysterectomyLevonorgestrelReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicLevonorgestrelAtypical endometrial hyperplasiaCochrane protocolEndometrial cancerFertility-sparing treatmentMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33830463
OpenAlexW3152332596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.