ReviewDer Radiologe2021
[Osseous variations in radiological diagnostics of the wrist].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueThe carpal joint is one of the most complex joints in the body comprising multiple bones that allow flexibility while simultaneously providing stability. Variations in osseous structures that may be either cause or result of pathological changes may make radiological reporting challenging. Only the knowledge of important osseous variations allows a reliable assessment of carpal imaging studies. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsThe standard imaging technique for evaluation of osseous carpal structures is conventional radiography, which is followed by computed tomography (CT) and-under special circumstances-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Other imaging methods such as sonography or nuclear medicine studies do not play a significant role in clinical routine. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Apart from continuous reduction in effective radiation dose, there have been no significant methodical improvements in the past decade regarding imaging of osseous carpal structures in clinical routine. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: As the initial diagnostic procedure, conventional radiography usually allows a safe and reliable diagnosis of osseous structures. Unclear or discrepant imaging findings between clinical and imaging assessment should initiate further imaging, preferably with CT. Only for certain questions or to reduce effective radiation dose in children MRI studies should be performed in clinical routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.