Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33830060›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Reasons for Discontinuing Active Participation on the Internet Forum Tinnitus Talk: Mixed Methods Citizen Science Study.

Sanja Budimir, Martin Kuska, Myra Spiliopoulou, Winfried Schlee, Rüdiger Pryss, Gerhard Andersson, Hazel Goedhart, Stephen Harrison, Markku Vesala, Gourish Hegde and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sanja Budimir *Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-9112
Martin Kuska *Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-2623
Myra SpiliopoulouKnowledge Management & Discovery Lab, Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-5759
Winfried SchleeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7942-1788
Rüdiger PryssInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-785X
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-6745
Hazel GoedhartTinnitus Hub, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-208X
Stephen HarrisonTinnitus Hub, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5951-3300
Markku VesalaTinnitus Hub, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-5556
Gourish HegdeKnowledge Management & Discovery Lab, Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3008-8678
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-510X
Christoph PiehDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-303X
Thomas ProbstDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-2133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTinnitus Talk is a nonprofit online self-help forum. Asking inactive users about their reasons for discontinued usage of health-related online platforms such as Tinnitus Talk is important for quality assurance.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore reasons for discontinued use of Tinnitus Talk, and their associations to the perceptions of Tinnitus Talk and the age of users who ceased logging on to the platform.

methodsInitially, 13,745 users that did not use Tinnitus Talk within the previous 2 months were contacted and the response rate was 20.47% (n=2814). After dataset filtering, a total of 2172 past members of Tinnitus Talk were included in the analyses. Nine predefined reasons for discontinued usage of Tinnitus Talk were included in the survey as well as one open question. Moreover, there were 14 predefined questions focusing on perception of Tinnitus Talk (usefulness, content, community, and quality of members' posts). Mixed methods analyses were performed. Frequencies and correlation coefficients were calculated for quantitative data, and grounded theory methodology was utilized for exploration of the qualitative data.

resultsQuantitative analysis revealed reasons for discontinued use of Tinnitus Talk as well as associations of these reasons with perceptions of Tinnitus Talk and age. Among the eight predefined reasons for discontinued use of Tinnitus Talk, the most frequently reported was not finding the information they were looking for (451/2695, 16.7%). Overall, the highest rated perception of Tinnitus Talk was content-related ease of understanding (mean 3.9, SD 0.64). A high number (nearly 40%) of participants provided additional free text explaining why they discontinued use. Qualitative analyses identified a total of 1654 specific reasons, more than 93% of which (n=1544) could be inductively coded. The coding system consisted of 33 thematically labeled codes clustered into 10 categories. The most frequent additional reason for discontinuing use was thinking that there is no cure or help for tinnitus symptoms (375/1544, 24.3%). Significant correlations (P<.001) were observed between reasons for discontinued usage and perception of Tinnitus Talk. Several reasons for discontinued usage were associated with the examined dimensions of perception of Tinnitus Talk (usefulness, content, community, as well as quality of members' posts). Moreover, significant correlations (P<.001) between age and reasons for discontinued use were found. Older age was associated with no longer using Tinnitus Talk because of not finding what they were looking for. In addition, older participants had a generally less positive perception of Tinnitus Talk than younger participants (P<.001).

conclusionsThis study contributes to understanding the reasons for discontinued usage of online self-help platforms, which are typically only reported according to the dropout rates. Furthermore, specific groups of users who did not benefit from Tinnitus Talk were identified, and several practical implications for improvement of the structure, content, and goals of Tinnitus Talk were suggested.

Indexed as

dropoutInternet forumreasons for discontinuationtinnitusTinnitus Talk

Identifiers

PMID33830060
PMCPMC8063098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.