Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829845›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2021

Measurement of the problematic usage of the Internet unidimensional quasitrait continuum with item response theory.

Jeggan Tiego, Christine Lochner, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Matthias Brand, Dan J Stein, Murat Yücel, Jon E Grant, Samuel R Chamberlain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeggan TiegoNeural Systems and Behaviour Laboratory.ORCID 0000-0001-7835-6398
Christine LochnerSA MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders.ORCID 0000-0002-4766-3704
Konstantinos IoannidisDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-1537-5425
Matthias BrandDepartment of General Psychology: Cognition.
Dan J SteinSA MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-7810
Murat YücelBrainPark.ORCID 0000-0002-4705-452X
Jon E GrantDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0001-7784-7021
Samuel R ChamberlainDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0001-7014-8121

Funding

Australian Government; Australian Defence Science and Technology (DST)Australian Government; Australian Research CouncilAustralian Government; Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (DIIS)Australian Government; National Health and Medical Research CouncilEuropean UnionGerman Federal Ministry for Education and ResearchGerman Federal Ministry for HealthGerman Research Foundation (DFG)Medical Research Council of South AfricaMonash UniversityNational Health and Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 110049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problematic usage of the internet (PUI) describes maladaptive use of online resources and is recognized as a growing worldwide issue. Here, we refined the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) for use as a screening tool to measure generalized internet use problems in normative samples. Analysis of response data with parametric unidimensional item response theory identified 10 items of the IAT that measured most of the PUI latent trait continuum with high precision in a subsample of 816 participants with meaningful variance in internet use problems. Selected items may characterize minor, or early stages of, PUI by measuring a preoccupation with the Internet, motivations to use online activities to escape aversive emotional experiences and regulate mood, as well as secrecy, defensiveness, and interpersonal conflict associated with internet use. Summed scores on these 10 items demonstrated a strong correlation with full-length IAT scores and comparable, or better, convergence with measures of impulsivity and compulsivity. Proposed cut-off scores differentiated between individuals potentially at risk of developing PUI from those with few self-reported internet use problems with good sensitivity and specificity. Differential item function testing revealed measurement equivalence between the sexes, Caucasians and non-Caucasians. However, evidence for differential test functioning between independent samples drawn from South Africa and the United States of America suggests that raw scores cannot be meaningfully compared between different geographic regions. These findings have implications for conceptualization and measurement of PUI in normative samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Psychological TestsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInternet Addiction DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychological TheoryPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSouth AfricaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33829845
PMCPMC8215856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.