Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829609›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2021

Clinical Results and Biomarker Analyses of Axitinib and TRC105 versus Axitinib Alone in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (TRAXAR).

Toni K Choueiri, Yousef Zakharia, Sumanta Pal, Judit Kocsis, Russell Pachynski, Alexandr Poprach, Andrew B Nixon, Yingmiao Liu, Mark Starr, Jing Lyu and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antagonizing CD105 and androgen receptor to target stromal-epithelial interactions for clinical benefit.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Toni K ChoueiriDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yousef ZakhariaUniversity of Iowa, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Sumanta PalCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Judit KocsisBács-Kiskun County Hospital, Oncoradiology Center, Kecskemét, Hungary.
Russell PachynskiDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Alexandr PoprachDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Andrew B NixonDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North, Carolina, USA.
Yingmiao LiuDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North, Carolina, USA.
Mark StarrDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North, Carolina, USA.
Jing LyuGraduate Group in Biostatistics, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Kouros OwzarDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mollie deShazoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Primo LaraUniversity of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
Lajos GecziOrszágos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Thai H HoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Meghara WalshDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bonne AdamsTRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Liz RobertsonTRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Mohamed DarifTRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Charles TheuerTRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USTracon Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház · HUCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNational Institute of Criminology · HUUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer CenterWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedThe combination of carotuximab with axitinib did not provide a benefit over axitinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had previously progressed on one or more vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapies. Exploratory evaluation of pretreatment circulating biomarkers suggested the combination might benefit patients who have low baseline VEGF levels.

backgroundEndoglin is an angiogenic receptor expressed on proliferating tumor vessels and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stem cells that is implicated as a mechanism of resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors. This study evaluated an antiendoglin monoclonal antibody (carotuximab, TRC105) combined with axitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors.

methodsTRAXAR was a multicenter, international randomized 1:1 (stratified by ECOG, 0 vs. 1), phase II study of carotuximab combined with axitinib versus axitinib alone in mccRCC patients who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent central review (ICR) per RECIST 1.1

resultsA total of 150 patients were randomized. The combination therapy resulted in shorter median PFS by RECIST 1.1 than axitinib monotherapy (6.7 vs. 11.4 months). The combination was tolerated similarly to axitinib monotherapy, and there were no treatment related deaths. Exploratory evaluation of pretreatment circulating biomarkers suggested the combination might benefit patients who have low baseline VEGF levels.

conclusionThe combination of carotuximab with axitinib did not demonstrate additional efficacy over single agent axitinib in patients with mccRCC who progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitor treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAxitinibHumansVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAntibodies, MonoclonalAxitinibcarotuximabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAxitinibCarotuximabEndoglinPhase IIRenal cell cancerTRAXARTRC105

Identifiers

PMID33829609
PMCPMC8265348
OpenAlexW3142337831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.