Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829499›Full record

Trial reportJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2022

Online-delivered parenting intervention for young children with disruptive behavior problems: a noninferiority trial focused on child and parent outcomes.

Ronald J Prinz, Carol W Metzler, Matthew R Sanders, Julie C Rusby, Chao Cai

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Finding Solutions to Scaling Parenting Programs That Work: a Systems-Contextual Approach.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Oppositional defiant disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronald J PrinzDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8184-420X
Carol W MetzlerOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.
Matthew R SandersSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia.
Julie C RusbyOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.
Chao CaiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Oregon Research Institute · USUniversity of South Carolina · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Online vs Staff Delivery: Child & Family Outcomes, Value Analysis, SatisfactionR01MH097699 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI PRINZ, RONALD J · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097699NIMH NIH HHS R01MH097699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated whether an evidence-based parenting intervention, when delivered online, could effectively address disruptive behavior problems in young children and yield outcomes comparable to in-person delivery of the same intervention.

methodsFamilies (n = 334) of children (3-7 years; 63% White, 22% African American, 15% other races; 63% male) with disruptive behavior problems were randomized to online-delivered intervention (ODI) or staff-delivered intervention (SDI), resulting in baseline and demographic equivalence. Primary outcome measures for child disruptive behavior (independent observation, parent report) and secondary outcome measures of parenting and family impact were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and follow-up. Conducted using intent-to-treat (ITT) as well as per-protocol (PP) methods, noninferiority analyses, which drew on an HLM framework with repeat measures across three timepoints and on REML to provide unbiased estimates of model parameters, tested whether the outcome-difference CI did not exceed the a priori noninferiority margin.

resultsFor ITT and PP analyses, the ODI was found to be noninferior to the SDI on the primary outcome: independently observed child disruptive behavior and parent-reported child behavior problems. The pattern for secondary outcomes was more varied: (a) noninferiority for observed positive and aversive parenting; (b) noninferiority for observed quality of parent-child relationship at post but not follow-up assessment; (c) noninferiority for parent-reported inappropriate/inconsistent discipline for PP but not ITT analyses; and (d) noninferiority not confirmed for parenting daily hassles and adverse family quality of life, despite large effect sizes for the ODI (Cohen's d .75-1.07). Finally, ODI noninferiority was found for teacher-reported child disruptive behavior.

conclusionsThe tested online-delivered parenting intervention demonstrated clear noninferiority with the corresponding staff-delivered parenting intervention on the primary outcome, child disruptive behavior problems, and reflected substantial though nonuniform noninferiority and meaningful effect sizes for secondary outcomes related to parenting and family. Future research will guide optimization of online interventions.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionProblem BehaviorChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsParentingQuality of Lifedisruptive behaviorinterventionparent-child interactionParentingRCT design

Identifiers

PMID33829499
PMCPMC9912029
OpenAlexW3150171208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.