Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829364›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2021

Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care.

Stijn C Voeten, Michel W J M Wouters, Franka S Würdemann, Pieta Krijnen, Inger B Schipper, J H Hegeman, DHFA Indicator Task Force

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Textbook Outcome After Oral Cancer Surgery as a Composite Measure for Survival and Quality-of-Care Evaluation.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stijn C VoetenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinesdreef 2, NL-2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. voetensc@gmail.com.
Michel W J M WoutersDutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Franka S WürdemannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinesdreef 2, NL-2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pieta KrijnenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinesdreef 2, NL-2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Inger B SchipperDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinesdreef 2, NL-2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J H HegemanDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo-Hengelo, The Netherlands.
DHFA Indicator Task Force
Leiden University Medical Center · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NLDutch Institute for Clinical Auditing · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual process indicators often do not enable the benchmarking of hospitals and often lack an association with outcomes of care. The composite hip fracture process indicator, textbook process, might be a tool to detect hospital variation and is associated with better outcomes during hospital stay. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine hospital variation in quality of hip fracture care using a composite process indicator (textbook process) and to evaluate at patient level whether fulfilment of the textbook process indicator was associated with better outcomes during hospital stay.

methodsHip fracture patients aged 70 and older operated in five hospitals between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Textbook process for hip fracture care was defined as follows: (1) assessment of malnutrition (2) surgery within 24 h, (3) orthogeriatric management during admission and (4) operation by an orthopaedic trauma certified surgeon. Hospital variation analysis was done by computing an observed/expected ratio (O/E ratio) for textbook process at hospital level. The expected ratios were derived from a multivariable logistic regression analysis including all relevant case-mix variables. The association between textbook process compliance and in-hospital complications and prolonged hospital stay was determined at patient level in a multivariable logistic regression model, with correction for patient, treatment and hospital characteristics. In-hospital complications were anaemia, delirium, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, in-hospital fall, heart failure, renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, wound infection and pressure ulcer.

resultsOf the 1371 included patients, 753 (55%) received care according to textbook process. At hospital level, the textbook compliance rates ranged from 38 to 76%. At patient level, textbook process compliance was significantly associated with fewer complications (38% versus 46%) (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), but not with hospital stay (median length of hospital stay was 5 days in both groups) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.78-1.30).

conclusionThe textbook process indicator for hip fracture care might be a tool to detect hospital variation. At patient level, this quality indicator is associated with fewer complications during hospital stay.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesQuality Indicators, Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overHospitalizationHospitalsHumansLength of StayAuditHip fractureQuality of careTextbook process

Identifiers

PMID33829364
PMCPMC8026419
OpenAlexW3141252017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.