Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829330›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and beta-blockers on dental implant stability.

Babak Saravi, Andreas Vollmer, Gernot Lang, Nicholai Adolphs, Zhen Li, Verena Giers, Peter Stoll

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Sympathetic Nervous System in Dental Implantology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Babak Saravi *Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Centre-Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstrasse 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. babak.saravi@jupiter.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2298-3696
Andreas Vollmer *Prof. Dr. Dr. Stoll & Partner Wilhelmstraße 3, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Gernot LangDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Centre-Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetterstrasse 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Nicholai AdolphsProf. Dr. Dr. Stoll & Partner Wilhelmstraße 3, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Zhen LiAO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Verena GiersProf. Dr. Dr. Stoll & Partner Wilhelmstraße 3, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter StollProf. Dr. Dr. Stoll & Partner Wilhelmstraße 3, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEAO Foundation · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent experimental research suggests antihypertensive medication reduces the failure risk of dental implants due to enhanced bone remodeling. However, evidence from clinical studies evaluating the impact of antihypertensive medication on implant stability is lacking.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 377 implants in 196 patients (46 implants inserted in antihypertensive drug users (AH) and 331 implants in non-users (NAH)) for implant stability measured by radiofrequency analysis, and we determined the implant stability quotient (ISQ). AH subgroups were stratified by the use of beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, and both of the aforementioned. The impact of antihypertensive medication on ISQ values at implant insertion (primary stability) and implant exposure (secondary stability) was analyzed by a linear regression model with a regression coefficient and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), adjusted for potential confounders.

resultsTime between implant insertion and implant exposure was 117.1 ± 56.6 days. ISQ values at insertion were 71.8 ± 8.7 for NAH and 74.1 ± 5.6 for AH, respectively. ISQ at exposure was 73.7 ± 8.1 for NAH and 75.7 ± 5.9 for AH. Regression analysis revealed that none of the AH subgroups were significantly related to ISQ at implant insertion. However, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RAS) were significantly associated with higher ISQ values at exposure (reg. coeff. 3.59, 95% CI 0.46-6.71 (p=0.025)).

conclusionsOutcome of the present study indicates enhanced bone remodeling and osseointegration following dental implant insertion in patients taking RAS inhibitors than in non-users. Future randomized prospective studies must confirm these indicative results.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsAntihypertensive AgentsHumansProspective StudiesRenin-Angiotensin SystemRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsDental ImplantsAntihypertensiveBeta-blockersBone remodelingImplantImplant stabilityISQOsseointegrationRenin-angiotensin system

Identifiers

PMID33829330
PMCPMC8026804
OpenAlexW3141970766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.