Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829305›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2021

Effects of remote ischemic conditioning on microcirculatory alterations in patients with sepsis: a single-arm clinical trial.

Inga Kiudulaite, Egle Belousoviene, Astra Vitkauskiene, Andrius Pranskunas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04644926 (Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients With Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04644926 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients With Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorLithuanian University of Health SciencesRan2018 to 2020Enrolled26ConditionsSeptic Shock, SepsisArmsRemote ischemic conditioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Promoting Resiliency to Stress in the Vascular Endothelium.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Neuroadaptive Biochemical Mechanisms of Remote Ischemic Conditioning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inga KiudulaiteDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, 50161, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Egle BelousovieneDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, 50161, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Astra VitkauskieneDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, 50009, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Andrius PranskunasDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, 50161, Kaunas, Lithuania. andrius.pranskunas@lsmuni.lt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9365-9984
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a promising technique that may protect organs and tissues from the effects of additional ischemic episodes. However, the therapeutic efficacy of RIC in humans with sepsis remains unknown. We hypothesized that RIC might improve sublingual microcirculation in patients with sepsis.

methodsThis prospective single-arm trial was performed in a mixed ICU at a tertiary teaching hospital. We included patients with sepsis or septic shock within 24 h of ICU admission. The RIC procedure comprised 3 cycles of brachial cuff inflation to 200 mmHg for 5 min followed by deflation to 0 mmHg for another 5 min. The procedure took 30 min. RIC was performed at the time of study inclusion and repeated after 12 and 24 h. Sublingual microcirculatory measurements were obtained before and after each RIC procedure using a Cytocam

resultsTwenty-six septic patients with a median age of 65 (57-81) years were enrolled in this study. The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at admission were 20 (13-23) and 10 (9-12), respectively. All patients were receiving vasopressors. After the 1st RIC procedure, the microvascular flow index (MFI) and the proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) among small vessels were significantly higher than before the procedure, with pre- and post-treatment values of 2.17 (1.81-2.69) and 2.59 (2.21-2.83), respectively, for MFI (p = 0.003) and 87.9 (82.4-93.8) and 92.5 (87.9-96.1) %, respectively, for PPV (p = 0.026). This result was confirmed by comparison with a historical control group. We found no change in microcirculatory flow or density parameters during repeated RIC after 12 h and 24 h.

conclusionIn patients with sepsis, the first remote ischemic conditioning procedure improved microcirculatory flow, whereas later procedures did not affect sublingual microcirculation. Trial registration NCT04644926, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Date of registration: 25 November 2020. Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04644926 .

Indexed as

IDF imagingMicrocirculationRemote ischemic conditioning

Identifiers

PMID33829305
PMCPMC8025901
OpenAlexW3142103612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.