Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829297›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Studying the sense of agency in the absence of motor movement: an investigation into temporal binding of tactile sensations and auditory effects.

S Antusch, R Custers, H Marien, H Aarts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisensory-Integration Account.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S AntuschDepartment of Psychology, Utrecht University, PO BOX 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands. s.antusch@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5131-0680
R CustersDepartment of Psychology, Utrecht University, PO BOX 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H MarienDepartment of Psychology, Utrecht University, PO BOX 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H AartsDepartment of Psychology, Utrecht University, PO BOX 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands. h.aarts@uu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People form coherent representations of goal-directed actions. Such agency experiences of intentional action are reflected by a shift in temporal perception: self-generated motor movements and subsequent sensory effects are perceived to occur closer together in time-a phenomenon termed intentional binding. Building on recent research suggesting that temporal binding occurs without intentionally performing actions, we further examined whether such perceptual compression occurs when motor action is fully absent. In three experiments, we used a novel sensory-based adaptation of the Libet clock paradigm to assess how a brief tactile sensation on the index finger and a resulting auditory stimulus perceptually bind together in time. Findings revealed robust temporal repulsion (instead of binding) between tactile sensation and auditory effect. Temporal repulsion was attenuated when participants could anticipate the identity and temporal onset (two crucial components of intentional action) of the tactile sensation. These findings are briefly discussed in the context of differences between intentional movement and anticipated bodily sensations in shaping action coherence and agentic experiences.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionHumansIntentionMovementTouchIntentional actionSense of agencyTactile inputTemporal binding

Identifiers

PMID33829297
PMCPMC8277642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.