Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829296›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2021

Assessing the dual-mycorrhizal status of a widespread tree species as a model for studies on stand biogeochemistry.

Justine Karst, James Franklin, Andrea Simeon, Ashley Light, Jonathan A Bennett, Nadir Erbilgin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justine KarstDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. justine.karst@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-1552
James FranklinDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8622-6750
Andrea SimeonDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Ashley LightDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Jonathan A BennettDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5617-7524
Nadir ErbilginDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9912-8095

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viewing plant species by their mycorrhizal type has explained a range of ecosystem processes. However, mycorrhizal type is confounded with plant phylogeny and the environments in which mycorrhizal partners occur. To circumvent these confounding effects, "dual-mycorrhizal" plant species may be potential models for testing the influence of mycorrhizal type on stand biogeochemistry. To assess their use as models, duality in mycorrhizas within a single host species must be confirmed and factors underlying their variation understood. We surveyed roots, soils, and leaves of mature aspen (Populus tremuloides) across 27 stands in western Canada spanning two biomes: boreal forest and parklands. Aspen roots were mostly ectomycorrhizal with sporadic and rare occurrences of arbuscular mycorrhizas. We further tested whether a climate moisture index predicted abundance of ectomycorrhizal roots (number of ectomycorrhizal root tips m

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeCarbonEcosystemPlant RootsSoilSoil MicrobiologyTreesCarbonSoilArbuscular mycorrhizaBiogeochemistryEctomycorrhizaSoil organic matter

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.