Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829238›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2021

Low protein intake, physical activity, and physical function in European and North American community-dwelling older adults: a pooled analysis of four longitudinal aging cohorts.

Nuno Mendonça, Linda M Hengeveld, Marjolein Visser, Nancy Presse, Helena Canhão, Eleanor M Simonsick, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Anne B Newman, Pierrette Gaudreau, Carol Jagger

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study-Ground-Breaking Science for 25 Years and Counting.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Optimizing the Design of Clinical Trials to Evaluate the Efficacy of Function-Promoting Therapies.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Nuno MendonçaEpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7589-9901
Linda M HengeveldDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjolein VisserDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5136-298X
Nancy PresseResearch Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-8666
Helena CanhãoEpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Eleanor M SimonsickNational Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephen B KritchevskySticht Center on Aging, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Anne B NewmanCenter for Aging and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Pierrette GaudreauDepartment of Medicine, University of Montréal, H3T 1J4, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Carol JaggerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6377-9926
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PTVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CANational Institute on Aging · USNewcastle University · GBUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Peripheral Nerve Function Decline in an Aged CohortR01AG028050 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STROTMEYER, ELSA S. · 2007 to 2015
$3.5M
End of Life in the Very OldR01NR012459 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ALBERT, STEVEN M, LUNNEY, JUNE R · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G0500997CIHR MOP-62842Medical Research Council G0500997Medical Research Council MR/J50001X/1NIA NIH HHS R01-AG028050NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary protein may slow the decline in muscle mass and function with aging, making it a sensible candidate to prevent or modulate disability progression. At present, studies providing reliable estimates of the association between protein intake and physical function, and its interaction with physical activity (PA), in community-dwelling older adults are lacking.

objectivesWe investigated the longitudinal relation between protein intake and physical function, and the interaction with PA.

methodsWe undertook a pooled analysis of individual participant data from cohorts in the PROMISS (PRevention Of Malnutrition In Senior Subjects in the European Union) consortium (the Health Aging and Body Composition Study, Quebec Longitudinal Study on Nutrition and Successful Aging, Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, and Newcastle 85+) in which 5725 community-dwelling older adults were followed up to 8.5 y. The relation between protein intake and walking speed was determined using joint models (linear mixed-effects and Cox proportional hazards models) and the relation with mobility limitation was investigated using multistate models.

resultsHigher protein intake was modestly protective of decline in walking speed in a dose-dependent manner [e.g., protein intake ≥1.2 compared with 0.8 g/kg adjusted body weight (aBW)/d: β = 0.024, 95% CI: 0.009, 0.032 SD/y], with no clear indication of interaction with PA. Participants with protein intake ≥0.8 g/kg aBW/d had also a lower likelihood of incident mobility limitation, which was observed for each level of PA. This association seemed to be dose-dependent for difficulty walking but not for difficulty climbing stairs. No associations between protein intake and other mobility limitations transitions were observed.

conclusionsHigher daily protein intake can reduce physical function decline not only in older adults with protein intake below the current RDA of 0.8 g/kg BW/d, but also in those with a protein intake that is already considered sufficient. This dose-dependent association was observed for each level of PA, suggesting no clear synergistic association between protein intake and PA in relation to physical function.

Indexed as

ExercisePhysical Functional PerformanceAgedAged, 80 and overDietary ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleNaphthoquinonesNetherlandsQuebecUnited KingdomWalking SpeedDietary ProteinsENDMNQNaphthoquinonesgait speedjoint modelsolder adultsone-stage meta-analysisphysical activityPROMISSproteinwalking speed

Identifiers

PMID33829238
PMCPMC8246618
OpenAlexW3145228236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.