Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829073›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2021

Postoperative or Salvage Proton Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.

Shivam M Kharod, Catherine E Mercado, Christopher G Morris, Curtis M Bryant, Nancy P Mendenhall, William M Mendenhall, R Charles Nichols, Bradford S Hoppe, Xiaoying Liang, Zhong Su and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shivam M KharodDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Catherine E MercadoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA.
Christopher G MorrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Curtis M BryantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Nancy P MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
William M MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
R Charles NicholsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Bradford S HoppeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Xiaoying LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Zhong SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Zuofeng LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Randal H HendersonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostprostatectomy radiation improves disease control, but limited data exist regarding outcomes, toxicities, and patient-reported quality of life with proton therapy. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The first 102 patients who were enrolled on an outcome tracking protocol between 2006 and 2017 and treated with double-scattered proton therapy after prostatectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Eleven (11%) received adjuvant radiation, while 91 (89%) received salvage radiation. Seventy-four received double-scattered proton therapy to the prostate bed only. Twenty-eight received a double-scattered proton therapy prostate-bed boost after prostate-bed and pelvic-node treatment. Eleven adjuvant patients received a median dose of 66.6 GyRBE (range, 66.0-70.2). Ninety-one salvage patients received a median dose of 70.2 GyRBE (range, 66.0-78.0). Forty-five patients received androgen deprivation therapy for a median 9 months (range, 1-30). Toxicities were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 criteria, and patient-reported quality-of-life data were reviewed.

resultsThe median follow-up was 5.5 years (range, 0.8-11.4 years). Five-year biochemical relapse-free and distant metastases-free survival rates were 72% and 91% for adjuvant patients, 57% and 97% for salvage patients, and 57% and 97% overall. Acute and late grade 3 or higher genitourinary toxicity rates were 1% and 7%. No patients had grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity. Acute and late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicities were 5% and 2%. The mean values and SDs of the International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite bowel function and bother were 7.5 (SD = 5.9), 10.2 (SD = 8.3), 92.8 (SD = 11.1), and 91.2 (SD = 6.4), respectively, at baseline, and 12.1 (SD = 9.1), 10.1 (SD = 6.7), 87.3 (SD = 18), and 86.7 (SD = 13.8) at the 5-year follow-up.

conclusionHigh-dose postprostatectomy proton therapy provides effective long-term biochemical control and freedom from metastasis, with low acute and long-term gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity.

Indexed as

prostate cancerproton therapyquality of liferadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33829073
PMCPMC8019576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.