Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33829002›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2021

Genetic and Non-genetic Workup for Pediatric Congenital Hearing Loss.

Ryan Belcher, Frank Virgin, Jessica Duis, Christopher Wootten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Insights into Hearing Loss.Audiology research · 2025
    Article
  3. Using Xenopus to discover new candidate genes involved in BOR and other congenital hearing loss syndromes.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Review
  4. Otoferlin gene therapy restores hearing in deaf children.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Selective Inner Hair Cell Loss in a Neonate Harbor Seal (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan BelcherDivision of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN, United States.
Frank VirginDivision of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN, United States.
Jessica DuisDivision of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN, United States.
Christopher WoottenDivision of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss is one of the most common concerns for presentation for a geneticist. Presentation prior to the age of one (congenital hearing loss), profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and bilateral hearing loss are sensitive and should raise concern for genetic causes of hearing loss and prompt referral for genetic testing. Genetic testing particularly in this instance offers the opportunity for anticipatory guidance including possible course of the hearing loss over time and also connection and evaluation for additional congenital anomalies that may be associated with an underlying syndrome vs. isolated genetic hearing loss.

Indexed as

congenital hearing deficitgeneticgenetic algorithmhearing losshearing problems

Identifiers

PMID33829002
PMCPMC8020033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.