Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828981›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Challenging Giant Insular Gliomas With Brain Mapping: Evaluation of Neurosurgical, Neurological, Neuropsychological, and Quality of Life Results in a Large Mono-Institutional Series.

Marco Rossi, Lorenzo Gay, Marco Conti Nibali, Tommaso Sciortino, Federico Ambrogi, Antonella Leonetti, Guglielmo Puglisi, Henrietta Howells, Paola Zito, Federico Villa and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Prognostic Factors and Resectability Predictors in Insular Gliomas: A Systematic Review.Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marco RossiNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo GayNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Marco Conti NibaliNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Tommaso SciortinoNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Federico AmbrogiLaboratory of Medical Statistics, Biometry, and Epidemiology "G.A. Maccararo," Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Antonella LeonettiNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Guglielmo PuglisiNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Henrietta HowellsLaboratory of Motor Control, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Laboratorio Interdisciplinare di Tecnologie Avanzate (LITA), Milano, Italy.
Paola ZitoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Federico VillaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Gjulio CiroiNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Marco RivaNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo BelloNeurosurgical Oncological Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGiant insular tumors are commonly not amenable to complete resection and are associated with a high postoperative morbidity rate. Transcortical approach and brain mapping techniques allow to identify peri-insular functional networks and, with neurophysiological monitoring, to reduce vascular-associated insults. Cognitive functions to be mapped are still under debate, and the analysis of the functional risk of surgery is currently limited to neurological examination. This work aimed to investigate the neurosurgical outcome (extent of resection, EOR) and functional impact of giant insular gliomas resection, focusing on neuropsychological and Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes.

methodsIn our retrospective analysis, we included all patients admitted in a five-year period with a radiological diagnosis of giant insular glioma. A transcortical approach was adopted in all cases. Resections were pursued up to functional boundaries defined intraoperatively by brain mapping techniques. We examined clinical, radiological, and intra-operative factors possibly affecting EOR and postoperative neurological, neuropsychological, and Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes.

resultsWe finally enrolled 95 patients in the analysis. Mean EOR was 92.3%. A Gross Total Resection (GTR) was obtained in 70 cases (73.7%). Five patients reported permanent morbidity (aphasia in 3, 3.2%, and superior quadrantanopia in 2, 2.1%). Suboptimal EOR associated with poor seizures control postoperatively. Extensive intraoperative mapping (inclusive of cognitive, visual, and haptic functions) decreased long-term neurological, neuropsychological, and QoL morbidity and increased EOR. Tumor infiltration of deep perforators (vessels arising either medial to lenticulostriate arteries through the anterior perforated substance or from the anterior choroidal artery) associated with a higher chance of postoperative ischemia in consonant areas, with the persistence of new-onset motor deficits 1-month post-op, and with minor EOR. Ischemic insults in eloquent sites represented the leading factor for long-term neurological and neuropsychological morbidity.

conclusionIn giant insular gliomas, the use of a transcortical approach with extensive brain mapping under awake anesthesia ensures broad insular exposure and extension of the surgical resection preserving patients' functional integrity. The relation between tumor mass and deep perforators predicts perioperative ischemic insults, the most relevant risk factor for long-term and permanent postoperative morbidity.

Indexed as

awake surgerybrain mappingextent of resectiongliomainsulaneuropsychological evaluationquality of life

Identifiers

PMID33828981
PMCPMC8019925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.