Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828958›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2021

Comparison of limited- and large-volume cone-beam computed tomography using a small voxel size for detecting isthmuses in mandibular molars.

Elen de Souza Tolentino, Pablo Andrés Amoroso-Silva, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Fernanda Chiguti Yamashita, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki, Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen, Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elen de Souza TolentinoDepartment of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4352-4694
Pablo Andrés Amoroso-SilvaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5112-6162
Murilo Priori AlcaldeDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-065X
Fernanda Chiguti YamashitaDepartment of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1053-2559
Lilian Cristina Vessoni IwakiDepartment of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-3056
Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-BullenDepartment of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-9433
Marco Antônio Húngaro DuarteDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-737X
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was performed to compare the ability of limited- and large-volume cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to display isthmuses in the apical root canals of mandibular molars. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty human mandibular first molars with isthmuses in the apical 3 mm of mesial roots were scanned by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and their thickness, area, and length were recorded. The samples were examined using 2 CBCT systems, using the smallest voxels and field of view available for each device. The Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Dunn multiple comparison tests were performed (α=0.05).

resultsThe 3D Accuitomo 170 and i-Cat devices detected 77.5% and 75.0% of isthmuses, respectively (

conclusionBoth CBCT systems performed similarly and did not detect isthmuses in the apical third in some cases. CBCT still does not equal the performance of micro-CT in isthmus detection, but it is nonetheless a valuable tool in endodontic practice.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyEndodonticsMolarX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID33828958
PMCPMC8007390
OpenAlexW3126579989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.