Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828934›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

Learning With Fewer Images via Image Clustering: Application to Intravascular OCT Image Segmentation.

Chaitanya Kolluru, Juhwan Lee, Yazan Gharaibeh, Hiram G Bezerra, David L Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chaitanya KolluruDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3211-7794
Juhwan LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-4588
Yazan GharaibehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8718-9664
Hiram G BezerraInterventional Cardiology Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, The University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9763-1463
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Computer assisted coronary artery stent interventionsR01HL143484 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BEZERRA, HIRAM, WILSON, DAVID LYNN · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
In vivo Characterization of Stents using Intravascular OCT ImagingR01HL114406 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BEZERRA, HIRAM, ROLLINS, ANDREW MARTIN · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114406NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning based methods are routinely used to segment various structures of interest in varied medical imaging modalities. Acquiring annotations for a large number of images requires a skilled analyst, and the process is both time consuming and challenging. Our approach to reduce effort is to reduce the number of images needing detailed annotation. For intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) image pullbacks, we tested 10% to 100% of training images derived from two schemes: equally-spaced image subsampling and deep-learning- based image clustering. The first strategy involves selecting images at equally spaced intervals from the volume, accounting for the high spatial correlation between neighboring images. In clustering, we used an autoencoder to create a deep feature space representation, performed k-medoids clustering, and then used the cluster medians for training. For coronary calcifications, a baseline U-net model was trained on all images from volumes of interest (VOIs) and compared with fewer images from the sub-sampling strategies. For a given sampling ratio, the clustering based method performed better or similar as compared to the equally spaced sampling approach (e.g., with 10% of images, mean F1 score for calcific class increased from 0.52 to 0.63, with equal spacing and with clustering, respectively). Additionally, for a fixed number of training images, sampling images from more VOIs performed better than otherwise. In conclusion, we recommend the clustering based approach to annotate a small fraction of images, creating a baseline model, which potentially can be improved further by annotating images selected using methods described in active learning research.

Indexed as

Annotationdeep learningimage clusteringoptical coherence tomographysemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID33828934
PMCPMC8023588
OpenAlexW3129251108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.