Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828856›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2021

The effect of three-dimensional (3D) printing on quantitative and qualitative outcomes in paediatric orthopaedic osteotomies: a systematic review.

Mohsen Raza, Daniel Murphy, Yael Gelfer

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05700526 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Customized Bone Allografts by Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D-printing for Correcting Musculoskeletal Deformities in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2022 to 2027Enrolled42ConditionsMusculoskeletal Deformity, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Musculoskeletal DisorderArmsPlanning of multiplanar and/or multifocal osteotomies in children by using VSP, PSIs and customized structural bone allograft, Routine preparation of bone graft according to standard protocols, Preparation of bone graft with virtual bone-matching and GSIs, Corrective osteotomy
NCT06380530 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2024 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsMusculoskeletal Deformity, Musculoskeletal Abnormalities, Musculoskeletal DisorderArmsDeformity correction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. 3D-assisted corrective osteotomies of the distal radius: a comparison of pre-contoured conventional implants versus patient-specific implants.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  11. The Era of Digital Orthopedics: A Bone or Bane?Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. 3D Printing Technology in Pediatric Orthopedics: a Primer for the Clinician.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohsen RazaDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daniel MurphyDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Yael GelferDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is increasingly being utilized in various surgical specialities. In paediatric orthopaedics it has been applied in the pre-operative and intra-operative stages, allowing complex deformities to be replicated and patient-specific instrumentation to be used. This systematic review analyses the literature on the effect of 3D printing on paediatric orthopaedic osteotomy outcomes.A systematic review of several databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the use of 3D printing technology in orthopaedic osteotomy procedures in children (aged ≤ 16 years) were included. Spinal and bone tumour surgery were excluded. Data extracted included demographics, disease pathology, target bone, type of technology, imaging modality used, qualitative/quantitative outcomes and follow-up. Articles were further categorized as either 'pre-operative' or 'intra-operative' applications of the technology.Twenty-two articles fitting the inclusion criteria were included. The reported studies included 212 patients. There were five articles of level of evidence 3 and 17 level 4.A large variety of outcomes were reported with the most commonly used being operating time, fluoroscopic exposure and intra-operative blood loss.A significant difference in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure, blood loss and angular correction was found in the 'intra-operative' application group. No significant difference was found in the 'pre-operative' category.Despite a relatively low evidence base pool of studies, our aggregate data demonstrate a benefit of 3D printing technology in various deformity correction applications, especially when used in the 'intra-operative' setting. Further research including paediatric-specific core outcomes is required to determine the potential benefit of this novel addition. Cite this article:

Indexed as

osteotomypaediatric orthopaedicpatient-specific instrumentationsurgerythree-dimensional (3D) printing

Identifiers

PMID33828856
PMCPMC8022016
OpenAlexW3126293117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.